Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang

2017-06-22 17:58 GMT+09:00 Ingo Molnar : > > * Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > >> This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not >> being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account >> for the fact that clang uses a different

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang

2017-06-22 17:58 GMT+09:00 Ingo Molnar : > > * Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > >> This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not >> being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account >> for the fact that clang uses a different option to configure the >> stack

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang

* Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not > being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account > for the fact that clang uses a different option to configure the > stack alignment than gcc

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang

* Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not > being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account > for the fact that clang uses a different option to configure the > stack alignment than gcc (-mstack-alignment=N vs >

[PATCH v5 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang

This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account for the fact that clang uses a different option to configure the stack alignment than gcc (-mstack-alignment=N vs -mpreferred-stack-boundary=N) Collaterally the

[PATCH v5 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang

This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account for the fact that clang uses a different option to configure the stack alignment than gcc (-mstack-alignment=N vs -mpreferred-stack-boundary=N) Collaterally the