Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:25:15 -0400 Qian Cai wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 09:27 -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 10:35 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-18 Thread Qian Cai
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 09:27 -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 10:35 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > Hi, > > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-17 Thread Qian Cai
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 10:35 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport > > Hi, > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > required for the basic usage and can be easily

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-17 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:20:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:35:34 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > > required

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-17 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 07:46:12AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 01:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:35:34 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file > > > descriptor. > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-16 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 01:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:35:34 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > > required for the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:35:34 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > required for the basic usage and can be easily added later either with or >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-16 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:28 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport > > Hi, > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > required for the basic usage and can be easily

[PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-16 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: Mike Rapoport Hi, This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly required for the basic usage and can be easily added later either with or without CMA. v5 changes: * rebase on

[PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

2020-09-16 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: Mike Rapoport Hi, This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly required for the basic usage and can be easily added later either with or without CMA. v5 changes: * rebase on