On Wed 07 Jun 09:27 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/2017 11:25 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 01 Jun 14:42 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > >
> > > Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
> > >
> > >
On Wed 07 Jun 09:27 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/2017 11:25 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 01 Jun 14:42 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > >
> > > Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
> > >
> > >
On 6/2/2017 11:25 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 01 Jun 14:42 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
regarding your points.
a- Do you mean caller's of q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership() should pass two
additional inputs
On 6/2/2017 11:25 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 01 Jun 14:42 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
regarding your points.
a- Do you mean caller's of q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership() should pass two
additional inputs
On Thu 01 Jun 14:42 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
>
> regarding your points.
>
> a- Do you mean caller's of q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership() should pass two
> additional inputs i.e. *next_perm and *next_vmid
>
On Thu 01 Jun 14:42 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
>
> regarding your points.
>
> a- Do you mean caller's of q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership() should pass two
> additional inputs i.e. *next_perm and *next_vmid
>
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
regarding your points.
a- Do you mean caller's of q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership() should pass two
additional inputs i.e. *next_perm and *next_vmid
and that based on successful return of qcom_scm_assign () they
should be treated as
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks lot many for such a blazing fast response :)
regarding your points.
a- Do you mean caller's of q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership() should pass two
additional inputs i.e. *next_perm and *next_vmid
and that based on successful return of qcom_scm_assign () they
should be treated as
On Thu 01 Jun 12:17 PDT 2017, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
> MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
> second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
> This patch in order to enable mss boot on msm8996 invoke scm call
> to switch or share ownership
On Thu 01 Jun 12:17 PDT 2017, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
> MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
> second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
> This patch in order to enable mss boot on msm8996 invoke scm call
> to switch or share ownership
MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
This patch in order to enable mss boot on msm8996 invoke scm call
to switch or share ownership between apps and modem.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
This patch in order to enable mss boot on msm8996 invoke scm call
to switch or share ownership between apps and modem.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
