Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Support address range reclaim

2013-05-27 Thread Minchan Kim
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:33:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:21:28 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > > > This patch adds address range reclaim of a process. > > The requirement is following as, > > > > Like webkit1, it uses a address space for handling multi tabs. > > IOW,

Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Support address range reclaim

2013-05-27 Thread Minchan Kim
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:33:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:21:28 +0900 Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote: This patch adds address range reclaim of a process. The requirement is following as, Like webkit1, it uses a address space for handling multi tabs.

Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Support address range reclaim

2013-05-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:21:28 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > This patch adds address range reclaim of a process. > The requirement is following as, > > Like webkit1, it uses a address space for handling multi tabs. > IOW, it uses *one* process model so all tabs shares address space > of the process.

Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Support address range reclaim

2013-05-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:21:28 +0900 Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote: This patch adds address range reclaim of a process. The requirement is following as, Like webkit1, it uses a address space for handling multi tabs. IOW, it uses *one* process model so all tabs shares address space of

[PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Support address range reclaim

2013-05-09 Thread Minchan Kim
This patch adds address range reclaim of a process. The requirement is following as, Like webkit1, it uses a address space for handling multi tabs. IOW, it uses *one* process model so all tabs shares address space of the process. In such scenario, per-process reclaim is rather coarse-grained so

[PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Support address range reclaim

2013-05-09 Thread Minchan Kim
This patch adds address range reclaim of a process. The requirement is following as, Like webkit1, it uses a address space for handling multi tabs. IOW, it uses *one* process model so all tabs shares address space of the process. In such scenario, per-process reclaim is rather coarse-grained so