Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Hello Lee, >> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas >> wrote: >> > >> > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C

Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Hello Lee, >> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas >> wrote: >> > >> > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are >> > either used

Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: > > > > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are > > either used in Device Tree source files or are

Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: > > > > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are > > either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as

Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello Lee, On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are > either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as > a compatible string. > > That's done because

Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello Lee, On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are > either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as > a compatible string. > > That's done because the plan is to change

[RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello, This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as a compatible string. That's done because the plan is to change the I2C core to report proper OF modaliases instead of always reporting a

[RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello, This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as a compatible string. That's done because the plan is to change the I2C core to report proper OF modaliases instead of always reporting a

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello Lee, On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> thanks for the series. >>> >>> > Most patches can be applied

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello Lee, On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> thanks for the series. >>> >>> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches >>>

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> thanks for the series. >> >> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches >> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> thanks for the series. >> >> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches >> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I >> > suggest

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: > thanks for the series. > > > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches > > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I > > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree. > > From my POV,

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote: > thanks for the series. > > > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches > > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I > > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree. > > From my POV,

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Javier, thanks for the series. > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree. From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree.

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Javier, thanks for the series. > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree. From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree.

[PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello, This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as a compatible string. That's done because the plan is to change the I2C core to report proper OF modaliases instead of always reporting a

[PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

Hello, This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as a compatible string. That's done because the plan is to change the I2C core to report proper OF modaliases instead of always reporting a