Hi everybody:
Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems
to have been a long time.
Thanks,
Zhen Lei
On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v5 -> v6:
> Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
> because this check is arch
Hi everybody:
Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems
to have been a long time.
Thanks,
Zhen Lei
On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v5 -> v6:
> Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
> because this check is arch
v5 -> v6:
Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
because this check is arch independent.
This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7
and 8,
other patches have no change.
v4 -> v5:
This version has no code changes, just add
v5 -> v6:
Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
because this check is arch independent.
This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7
and 8,
other patches have no change.
v4 -> v5:
This version has no code changes, just add
4 matches
Mail list logo
