Re: [PATCH v8] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs

2016-07-05 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:20:20AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > From: Steve Capper > > It can be useful for JIT software to be aware of MIDR_EL1 and > REVIDR_EL1 to ascertain the presence of any core errata that could > affect code generation. > > This patch exposes

Re: [PATCH v8] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs

2016-07-05 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:20:20AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > From: Steve Capper > > It can be useful for JIT software to be aware of MIDR_EL1 and > REVIDR_EL1 to ascertain the presence of any core errata that could > affect code generation. > > This patch exposes these registers through

[PATCH v8] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs

2016-07-04 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
From: Steve Capper It can be useful for JIT software to be aware of MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to ascertain the presence of any core errata that could affect code generation. This patch exposes these registers through sysfs:

[PATCH v8] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs

2016-07-04 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
From: Steve Capper It can be useful for JIT software to be aware of MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to ascertain the presence of any core errata that could affect code generation. This patch exposes these registers through sysfs: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$ID/regs/identification/midr_el1