On 02/23/2017 12:34 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>> That's the main one where debugging was happening. There may be a couple
>> of others floating around that I hadn't had time to fully investigate.
>> I'll dupe them to the above if I find them.
>
> [
On 02/23/2017 12:34 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>> That's the main one where debugging was happening. There may be a couple
>> of others floating around that I hadn't had time to fully investigate.
>> I'll dupe them to the above if I find them.
>
> [
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
> That's the main one where debugging was happening. There may be a couple
> of others floating around that I hadn't had time to fully investigate.
> I'll dupe them to the above if I find them.
[ adding Joey and Gary to CC ]
Laura,
have you by any
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
> That's the main one where debugging was happening. There may be a couple
> of others floating around that I hadn't had time to fully investigate.
> I'll dupe them to the above if I find them.
[ adding Joey and Gary to CC ]
Laura,
have you by any
On 01/30/2017 05:10 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
>>>
>>> FYI,
On 01/30/2017 05:10 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
>>>
>>> FYI,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
> > > There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
> > > with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
> >
> > FYI, you may want to ask the reporter to try out
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
> > > There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
> > > with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
> >
> > FYI, you may want to ask the reporter to try out
On 01/27/2017 11:34 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct, at 12:54:11PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
FYI, you may want
On 01/27/2017 11:34 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct, at 12:54:11PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
FYI, you may want
On Mon, 24 Oct, at 12:54:11PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
> There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
> with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
FYI, you may want to ask the reporter to try out Jiri's
On Mon, 24 Oct, at 12:54:11PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
> There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
> with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
FYI, you may want to ask the reporter to try out Jiri's
On 10/20/2016 05:03 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct, at 02:13:00PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup
On 10/20/2016 05:03 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct, at 02:13:00PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup
On Wed, 19 Oct, at 02:13:00PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Fedora received a bug report
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
> >of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup
> >problem.
>
On Wed, 19 Oct, at 02:13:00PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Fedora received a bug report
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
> >of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup
> >problem.
>
On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup problem.
1297667083d5442aafe3e337b9413bf02b114edb was linked as the cause
of the problem.
On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup problem.
1297667083d5442aafe3e337b9413bf02b114edb was linked as the cause
of the problem.
Hi,
Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup problem.
1297667083d5442aafe3e337b9413bf02b114edb was linked as the cause
of the problem.
x86/efi: Only map RAM into EFI page tables if in
Hi,
Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup problem.
1297667083d5442aafe3e337b9413bf02b114edb was linked as the cause
of the problem.
x86/efi: Only map RAM into EFI page tables if in
20 matches
Mail list logo
