On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:06:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > It's commonplace for me to provide Acks for patches I know will
> > > *eventually* be applied by me. Removing them when applying patches is
> > > part of my daily routine.
> > You're the
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:06:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > It's commonplace for me to provide Acks for patches I know will
> > > *eventually* be applied by me. Removing them when applying patches is
> > > part of my daily routine.
> > You're the
On Tue, 16 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
> > > ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because
On Tue, 16 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
> > > ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because
Hello Mark and Lee,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
>> > ack - like I say if
Hello Mark and Lee,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
>> > ack - like I say if I'm acking something
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
> > ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because I
> > expect someone else to actually apply it
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
> > ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because I
> > expect someone else to actually apply it
On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:36:25AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown
>
> Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
> ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's
On Sun, 14 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:36:25AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown
>
> Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
> ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because I
>
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:36:25AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Acked-by: Mark Brown
Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because I
expect someone else to actually
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:36:25AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Acked-by: Mark Brown
Since I'm expected to apply this I wouldn't normally expect to see my
ack - like I say if I'm acking something for me it's normally because I
expect someone else to actually apply it (that's the
The Samsung email address will stop working soon, so use my personal
email address instead.
Also, there used to be a MFD and RTC drivers for max77802 but now these
have been merged with the max77686 MFD and RTC drivers. The only driver
that's still max77802 specific is the regulator one since
The Samsung email address will stop working soon, so use my personal
email address instead.
Also, there used to be a MFD and RTC drivers for max77802 but now these
have been merged with the max77686 MFD and RTC drivers. The only driver
that's still max77802 specific is the regulator one since
14 matches
Mail list logo