On 17.11.2023 11:30, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:12:38AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 15.11.2023 14:11, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 10:20:04AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This adds test which checks, that updating
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:12:38AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
On 15.11.2023 14:11, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 10:20:04AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This adds test which checks, that updating SO_RCVLOWAT value also sends
You can avoid "This adds", and write just
On 15.11.2023 14:11, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 10:20:04AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds test which checks, that updating SO_RCVLOWAT value also sends
>
> You can avoid "This adds", and write just "Add test ...".
>
> See
>
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 10:20:04AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This adds test which checks, that updating SO_RCVLOWAT value also sends
You can avoid "This adds", and write just "Add test ...".
See
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
Describe
This adds test which checks, that updating SO_RCVLOWAT value also sends
credit update message. Otherwise mutual hungup may happen when receiver
didn't send credit update and then calls 'poll()' with non default
SO_RCVLOWAT value (e.g. waiting enough bytes to read), while sender
waits for free
5 matches
Mail list logo