On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:23:04 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
> > > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model =
> > > ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC;
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:23:04 +0100, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
--- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model =
ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC;
static
On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
> > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model =
> > ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC;
> >
> > static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
> > {
> > - int irq
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:44:53 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> This API is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map but does link
> parent/child IRQ controllers. This is tested for primary GIC PPI and GIC SPI
> interrupts and not for secondary child irq controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel
On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Grant Likely wrote:
--- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model =
ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC;
static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
{
- int irq =
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:44:53 +0800, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This API is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map but does link
parent/child IRQ controllers. This is tested for primary GIC PPI and GIC SPI
interrupts and not for secondary child irq controllers.
Signed-off-by:
On 2013年12月05日 11:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote:
+ /*
+* ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we
+* use different mappings from DT in ACPI.
+*
+* For FDT
+* PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15];
+
On 2013年12月05日 11:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote:
+ /*
+* ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we
+* use different mappings from DT in ACPI.
+*
+* For FDT
+* PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15];
+
On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> + /*
> +* ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we
> +* use different mappings from DT in ACPI.
> +*
> +* For FDT
> +* PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15];
> +* SPI interrupt: in the
On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote:
+ /*
+* ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we
+* use different mappings from DT in ACPI.
+*
+* For FDT
+* PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15];
+* SPI interrupt: in the range
This API is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map but does link
parent/child IRQ controllers. This is tested for primary GIC PPI and GIC SPI
interrupts and not for secondary child irq controllers.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
---
drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
This API is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map but does link
parent/child IRQ controllers. This is tested for primary GIC PPI and GIC SPI
interrupts and not for secondary child irq controllers.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap amit.dan...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
12 matches
Mail list logo