Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On 31/03/17 11:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 30/03/17 22:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > On 30/03/17

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On 31/03/17 11:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 30/03/17 22:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> >> On

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 30/03/17 22:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> Hi, >> >> > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Friday, March 24, 2017

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 30/03/17 22:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> Hi, >> >> > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: >> >> > No

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On 30/03/17 22:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > >> > No assumption can be made upon the rate at

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On 30/03/17 22:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > >> > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, Hi, > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: >> > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get >> > triggered, as there are

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, Hi, > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: >> > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get >> > triggered, as there are scheduling policies

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On 30 March 2017 at 10:58, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: >> > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get >> > triggered, as there are scheduling

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On 30 March 2017 at 10:58, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: >> > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get >> > triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

Hi, On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get > > triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which > > don't trigger them so frequently. >

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

Hi, On 30/03/17 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get > > triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which > > don't trigger them so frequently. >

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get > triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which > don't trigger them so frequently. > > Remove such assumption from the code. But the

Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get > triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which > don't trigger them so frequently. > > Remove such assumption from the code. But the

[RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which don't trigger them so frequently. Remove such assumption from the code. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Peter Zijlstra

[RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which don't trigger them so frequently. Remove such assumption from the code. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rafael J.