On 08/01/2013 06:04 PM, Nix wrote:
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert verbalised:
On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert verbalised:
> On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
>>
>>> On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
> Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
> for.
On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert verbalised:
On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the
On 08/01/2013 06:04 PM, Nix wrote:
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert verbalised:
On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
On 07/31/2013 05:15 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> "Bernd" == Bernd Schubert writes:
>
> Bernd,
>
>>> Product revision level: R001
>
> It's clearly not verbatim passthrough...
>
> Bernd> Besides the firmware, the difference might be that I'm exporting
> Bernd> single disks without any
On 07/31/2013 05:15 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Bernd == Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm writes:
Bernd,
Product revision level: R001
It's clearly not verbatim passthrough...
Bernd Besides the firmware, the difference might be that I'm exporting
Bernd single disks without
> "Nick" == Nick Alcock writes:
Nick> in which case we don't actually know that your Areca controller
Nick> supports the VPD page we thought it did: quite possibly only this
Nick> underlying disk does.
The ATA Information VPD page is created by the SCSI-ATA Translation
layer. The controller
> "Bernd" == Bernd Schubert writes:
Bernd,
>> Product revision level: R001
It's clearly not verbatim passthrough...
Bernd> Besides the firmware, the difference might be that I'm exporting
Bernd> single disks without any areca-raidset in between. I can try to
Bernd> confirm that
> "Doug" == Douglas Gilbert writes:
Doug> I just examined a more recent Areca SAS RAID controller and would
Doug> describe it as the SCSI device from hell. One solution to this
Doug> problem is to modify the arcmsr driver so it returns a more
Doug> consistent set of lies to the management
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
> On 07/30/2013 01:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> (wheezy)fslab1:~# sg_inq -v /dev/sdc
>> inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 24 00
>> standard INQUIRY:
>> inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 60 00
>> PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3]
>>
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
> On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
>> On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
>>
>>> Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
>>> for.
>>
>> Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
>> the same company!)
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
the same company!)
I didn't realise the original fix was actually implemented
On 07/30/2013 01:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Nix" == Nix writes:
Bernd,
Nix> I can now confirm that reverting this commit causes this problem to
Nix> go away, and my machine boots fine again.
Can you please send me the output of sq_inq with your 1.49 firmware?
I made a tweak that
On 07/30/2013 01:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Nix == Nix n...@esperi.org.uk writes:
Bernd,
Nix I can now confirm that reverting this commit causes this problem to
Nix go away, and my machine boots fine again.
Can you please send me the output of sq_inq with your 1.49 firmware?
I made a
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
the same company!)
I didn't realise the original fix was actually implemented
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
the same company!)
I didn't
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
On 07/30/2013 01:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
(wheezy)fslab1:~# sg_inq -v /dev/sdc
inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 24 00
standard INQUIRY:
inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 60 00
PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3]
[AERC=0]
Doug == Douglas Gilbert dgilb...@interlog.com writes:
Doug I just examined a more recent Areca SAS RAID controller and would
Doug describe it as the SCSI device from hell. One solution to this
Doug problem is to modify the arcmsr driver so it returns a more
Doug consistent set of lies to the
Bernd == Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm writes:
Bernd,
Product revision level: R001
It's clearly not verbatim passthrough...
Bernd Besides the firmware, the difference might be that I'm exporting
Bernd single disks without any areca-raidset in between. I can try to
Bernd confirm
Nick == Nick Alcock nick.alc...@esperi.org.uk writes:
Nick in which case we don't actually know that your Areca controller
Nick supports the VPD page we thought it did: quite possibly only this
Nick underlying disk does.
The ATA Information VPD page is created by the SCSI-ATA Translation
layer.
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
> Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
> for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
the same company!)
I didn't realise the original fix was actually implemented to allow
Bernd, with a different
On 13-07-29 05:09 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert uttered the following:
On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device
> "Nix" == Nix writes:
Bernd,
Nix> I can now confirm that reverting this commit causes this problem to
Nix> go away, and my machine boots fine again.
Can you please send me the output of sq_inq with your 1.49 firmware?
I made a tweak that allowed Nix to boot but we're trying to find a
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert uttered the following:
> On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
>>
>>> Hi Nick,
>>>
>>> On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device command of
> "Nix" == Nix writes:
Nix> spindle:/boot# sg_vpd --page=0x89 /dev/sda ATA information VPD
Nix> page: fetching VPD page failed
Please add -v
I'll also need the output of:
# sg_vpd -vl
Nix> I'll try rebooting into a kernel with that commit reverted next.
Doesn't matter as far as the sg
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:
> Could you try to run these commands with 3.10.1?
>
> # # check if reporting opcodes works
> # sg_opcodes -v -n /dev/sdX
spindle:/boot# sg_opcodes -v -n /dev/sda
inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 24 00
Report Supported Operation Codes cmd: a3 0c 00 00
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:
> On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
>>> I tested this patch with ARC-1260 and F/W V1.49, no issues. Also, this
>>> patch is only in 3.10.3, but not yet in 3.10.1.
>>
>> ... and I see this problem with 3.10.3 but
> "Bernd" == Bernd Schubert writes:
Bernd> I tested this patch with ARC-1260 and F/W V1.49, no issues.
It could be due to the firmware version discrepancy.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> "Nick" == Nick Alcock writes:
Nick> My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
Nick> upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Nick> [ 0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 & Model
Nick> ARC-1210 [ 0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID
Nick>
On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 0
arcmsr: executing bus reset eh.num_resets=0, num_[...]
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
>> arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
>> arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 0
>> arcmsr: executing bus reset eh.num_resets=0, num_[...]
>>
>> arcmsr0: wait 'abort
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Instead of
[0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 & Model ARC-1210
[0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter
My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Instead of
[0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 & Model ARC-1210
[0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller
Driver Version 1.20.00.15 2010/08/05
My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Instead of
[0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 Model ARC-1210
[0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller
Driver Version 1.20.00.15 2010/08/05
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Instead of
[0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 Model ARC-1210
[0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 0
arcmsr: executing bus reset eh.num_resets=0, num_[...]
arcmsr0: wait 'abort all
On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 0
arcmsr: executing bus reset eh.num_resets=0, num_[...]
Nick == Nick Alcock n...@esperi.org.uk writes:
Nick My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
Nick upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Nick [ 0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 Model
Nick ARC-1210 [ 0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID
Bernd == Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm writes:
Bernd I tested this patch with ARC-1260 and F/W V1.49, no issues.
It could be due to the firmware version discrepancy.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:
On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
I tested this patch with ARC-1260 and F/W V1.49, no issues. Also, this
patch is only in 3.10.3, but not yet in 3.10.1.
... and I see this problem with 3.10.3 but not 3.10.1.
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:
Could you try to run these commands with 3.10.1?
# # check if reporting opcodes works
# sg_opcodes -v -n /dev/sdX
spindle:/boot# sg_opcodes -v -n /dev/sda
inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 24 00
Report Supported Operation Codes cmd: a3 0c 00 00 00
Nix == Nix n...@esperi.org.uk writes:
Nix spindle:/boot# sg_vpd --page=0x89 /dev/sda ATA information VPD
Nix page: fetching VPD page failed
Please add -v
I'll also need the output of:
# sg_vpd -vl
Nix I'll try rebooting into a kernel with that commit reverted next.
Doesn't matter as far
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert uttered the following:
On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 0
Nix == Nix n...@esperi.org.uk writes:
Bernd,
Nix I can now confirm that reverting this commit causes this problem to
Nix go away, and my machine boots fine again.
Can you please send me the output of sq_inq with your 1.49 firmware?
I made a tweak that allowed Nix to boot but we're trying to
On 13-07-29 05:09 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert uttered the following:
On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
Hi Nick,
On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
arcmsr0: abort device
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
the same company!)
I didn't realise the original fix was actually implemented to allow
Bernd, with a different Areca
48 matches
Mail list logo
