Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>>> This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
>>> I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output
>>> of the guest.
>>>
>> I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output
of the guest.
I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only
gets
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output
of the guest.
I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
>> I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output
>> of the guest.
>>
>
> I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only
> gets tested
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the
guest.
I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only
gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it
Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb:
> Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the
>> Kconfig
>> accordingly.
>>
>
> !PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How
> does it fail?
>
>J
>
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the Kconfig
accordingly.
!PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How
does it fail?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the Kconfig
accordingly.
!PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How
does it fail?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb:
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the
Kconfig
accordingly.
!PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How
does it fail?
J
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the
guest.
I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only
gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output
of the guest.
I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only
gets tested rarely. Chris
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Arnd Hannemann wrote:
This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same:
I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output
of the guest.
I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it
12 matches
Mail list logo
