Hi
> > > > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase
> > > > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings
> > > > where it becomes an ABI.
> >
> > > I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to
> > > find
>
Hi
> > > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase
> > > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings
> > > where it becomes an ABI.
>
> > I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to
> > find
> > another
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:17:31PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:57 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase
> > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings
> > where it becomes an ABI.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:57 PM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:00:14PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>
> > This property can be global in which case all links created will be DPCM
> > or present in certian dai-link subnode in which case only that specific
> > link is forced to be
4 matches
Mail list logo
