Re: [lustre cleanups 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1 compiles

On 2015/12/01, 15:05, "Valdis Kletnieks" wrote: >Start of a batch series to clean up the Lustre tree. Other people have >done some sparse and checkpatch cleanups, but I found a bunch of >stuff building with W=1. Hello Valdis, thanks for these patches. Strictly speaking, they should also be

Re: [lustre cleanups 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1 compiles

On 2015/12/01, 15:05, "Valdis Kletnieks" wrote: >Start of a batch series to clean up the Lustre tree. Other people have >done some sparse and checkpatch cleanups, but I found a bunch of >stuff building with W=1. Hello Valdis, thanks for these patches. Strictly

[lustre cleanups 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1 compiles

Start of a batch series to clean up the Lustre tree. Other people have done some sparse and checkpatch cleanups, but I found a bunch of stuff building with W=1. Valdis Kletnieks (6): Swap inline/const to kill 272 warnings Fix set-but-unused whinge. Clean up another C warnining: Fix

[lustre cleanups 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1 compiles

Start of a batch series to clean up the Lustre tree. Other people have done some sparse and checkpatch cleanups, but I found a bunch of stuff building with W=1. Valdis Kletnieks (6): Swap inline/const to kill 272 warnings Fix set-but-unused whinge. Clean up another C warnining: Fix