Re: [patch] FLAT binaries: drop BINFMT_FLAT bad header magic warning

2008-02-12 Thread Greg Ungerer
Mike Frysinger wrote: The warning issued by fs/binfmt_flat.c when the format handler is given a non-FLAT and non-script executable is annoying to say the least when working with FDPIC ELF objects. If you build a kernel that supports both FLAT and FDPIC ELFs on no-mmu, every time you execute an

Re: [patch] FLAT binaries: drop BINFMT_FLAT bad header magic warning

2008-02-12 Thread Greg Ungerer
Mike Frysinger wrote: The warning issued by fs/binfmt_flat.c when the format handler is given a non-FLAT and non-script executable is annoying to say the least when working with FDPIC ELF objects. If you build a kernel that supports both FLAT and FDPIC ELFs on no-mmu, every time you execute an

[patch] FLAT binaries: drop BINFMT_FLAT bad header magic warning

2008-02-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
The warning issued by fs/binfmt_flat.c when the format handler is given a non-FLAT and non-script executable is annoying to say the least when working with FDPIC ELF objects. If you build a kernel that supports both FLAT and FDPIC ELFs on no-mmu, every time you execute an FDPIC ELF, the kernel

[patch] FLAT binaries: drop BINFMT_FLAT bad header magic warning

2008-02-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
The warning issued by fs/binfmt_flat.c when the format handler is given a non-FLAT and non-script executable is annoying to say the least when working with FDPIC ELF objects. If you build a kernel that supports both FLAT and FDPIC ELFs on no-mmu, every time you execute an FDPIC ELF, the kernel