Re: [perfmon] Re: conflict between tickless and perfmon2

2007-11-14 Thread Stephane Eranian
Thomas, On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > It looks like a solution would be to change the implementation of > > > timeout-based switching to use HR timers instead. Similar to what is > > > done for ITIMER_REAL

Re: [perfmon] Re: conflict between tickless and perfmon2

2007-11-14 Thread Stephane Eranian
Thomas, On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: It looks like a solution would be to change the implementation of timeout-based switching to use HR timers instead. Similar to what is done for ITIMER_REAL and