On Tuesday November 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> raid5-fix-unending-write-sequence.patch is in -mm and I believe is
> waiting on an Acked-by from Neil?
>
It seems to have just been sent on to Linus, so it probably will go in
without:
Acked-By: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:36:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 8:43 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 "md: raid5:
> > > fix clearing of biofill operations" which ended up misapplied in
> > > Linus' tree,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:36:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 8:43 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 md: raid5:
fix clearing of biofill operations which ended up misapplied in
Linus' tree, You should either
On Tuesday November 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
raid5-fix-unending-write-sequence.patch is in -mm and I believe is
waiting on an Acked-by from Neil?
It seems to have just been sent on to Linus, so it probably will go in
without:
Acked-By: NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm beginning to
On Nov 13, 2007 8:43 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 "md: raid5:
> > fix clearing of biofill operations" which ended up misapplied in
> > Linus' tree, You should either also pick up def6ae26 "md: fix
> > misapplied patch in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:36:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It appears that a couple of bugs
On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > >
> > > It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
> > > These two patches fix them and are
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
> > These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
> > as 2.6.24-rcX
> >
> > Thanks,
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
> These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
> as 2.6.24-rcX
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
> [PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix an unsigned compare to allow
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
as 2.6.24-rcX
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix an unsigned compare to allow creation
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
as 2.6.24-rcX
Thanks,
NeilBrown
On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
These two patches fix them and are appropriate for
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:36:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to
On Nov 13, 2007 8:43 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 md: raid5:
fix clearing of biofill operations which ended up misapplied in
Linus' tree, You should either also pick up def6ae26 md: fix
misapplied patch in raid5.c or I can
14 matches
Mail list logo
