On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:13:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?
>
> I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:59:17AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of
> > features.
>
> No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since
> regardless of what
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?
I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry.
However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please
send a
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of
> features.
No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since
regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:23:36PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > Generic event handling mechanism.
> >
> > Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:23:36PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications.
It
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of
features.
No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since
regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?
I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry.
However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please
send a new
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:59:17AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of
features.
No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since
regardless of what version
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:13:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?
I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two,
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Generic event handling mechanism.
The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error:
CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o
CC kernel/kevent/kevent_user.o
CC kernel/kevent/kevent_timer.o
CC
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:28:05AM -0600, David M. Lloyd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > Generic event handling mechanism.
>
> The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error:
>
> CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o
>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> Generic event handling mechanism.
>
> Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications.
> It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to
> poll/epoll in some
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications.
It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to
poll/epoll in some cases, but
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:28:05AM -0600, David M. Lloyd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error:
CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o
CC
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error:
CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o
CC kernel/kevent/kevent_user.o
CC kernel/kevent/kevent_timer.o
CC
Generic event handling mechanism.
Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications.
It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to
poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and
allows to work with essentially eny kind of events.
Generic event handling mechanism.
Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications.
It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to
poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and
allows to work with essentially eny kind of events.
18 matches
Mail list logo
