Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-12 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:24:44 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I backed out x86_64-mm-msr-on-cpu.patch (again) and went with Alexey's > > second version (again). It works fine. > > I think I'll just drop the thing. Nuisance:gain seems to be out of order It hasn't caused me

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-12 Thread Andi Kleen
On Monday 12 February 2007 23:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:38:23 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 11 February 2007 01:11, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > The patch titled >

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-12 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:38:23 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 11 February 2007 01:11, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > The patch titled > > > rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu > > > has been removed

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:38:23 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 11 February 2007 01:11, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch titled rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu has been removed from the -mm tree.

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-12 Thread Andi Kleen
On Monday 12 February 2007 23:00, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:38:23 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 11 February 2007 01:11, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch titled

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:24:44 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I backed out x86_64-mm-msr-on-cpu.patch (again) and went with Alexey's second version (again). It works fine. I think I'll just drop the thing. Nuisance:gain seems to be out of order It hasn't caused me any

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sunday 11 February 2007 01:11, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The patch titled > > rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu > > has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was > > rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch > > > >

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sunday 11 February 2007 01:11, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch titled rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch This patch was

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-10 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The patch titled > rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu > has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was > rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch > > This patch was dropped because I've lost the plot on this thing

Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-02-10 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:32:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch titled rdmsr_on_cpu, wrmsr_on_cpu has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch This patch was dropped because I've lost the plot on this thing Alexey,