"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:45:13 -0600 (CST)
>From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'm not familiar enough with the tcp code to know if this patch
>(against -ac6) is a solution, band-aid, or, in fact, wrong, but
>I've run with it (on -ac3)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:45:13 -0600 (CST)
From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not familiar enough with the tcp code to know if this patch
(against -ac6) is a solution, band-aid, or, in fact, wrong, but
I've run with it (on -ac3) and haven't seen the errors for over
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Paul Cassella wrote:
> and mss_now seems to be less than skb->len when the printk happens. My
> copy of K is at work; could that comparison be being done unsigned
> because of skb->len? I wouldn't think so, but the alternative seems
> somewhat worse...
That'll teach me to
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> is this still reproducible? If so can I send you a debugging
> patch to diagnose a bit further?
Yes to both. If I get a patch in the next hour or so, I can have it
running before I go to work. Otherwise I won't be able to try it until
this evening.
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
> > write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
> Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
> errors ?
The CVS version (perhaps even
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 01:16:27 -0600 (CST)
From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Would it be more helpful if I were to check something like
socki_lookup(file->f_dentry->f_inode)->ops == tcp_prot
instead?
No, helpful would be for you to present us with a test case program
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:55:28 -0600 (CST)
>From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[1.] One line summary of the problem:
>
>write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
>
> What you describe I can only
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>
> write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
errors ?
Also over what interface do you
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
errors ?
Also over what interface do you run
9 matches
Mail list logo