Re: 2.6.20-mm1: PTRACE=y, PROC_FS=n compile error

2007-02-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:15:10AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y, > > CONFIG_PROC_FS=n: > > Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n > could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the

Re: 2.6.20-mm1: PTRACE=y, PROC_FS=n compile error

2007-02-21 Thread Roland McGrath
> This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y, > CONFIG_PROC_FS=n: Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the function for fs/proc/base.c to use (and because that uses it many more times

Re: 2.6.20-mm1: PTRACE=y, PROC_FS=n compile error

2007-02-21 Thread Roland McGrath
This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n: Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the function for fs/proc/base.c to use (and because that uses it many more times than

Re: 2.6.20-mm1: PTRACE=y, PROC_FS=n compile error

2007-02-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:15:10AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n: Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the function for

2.6.20-mm1: PTRACE=y, PROC_FS=n compile error

2007-02-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3: >... > +utrace-utrace-ptrace-compat.patch >... > utrace tree >... This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n: <-- snip --> ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-19 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 08:55 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:37:12 -0600 Steve Fox wrote: > > > bl6-13, an x86_64 box listed on test.kernel.org, tripped on this during > > an LTP run, even with > > unify-queue_delayed_work-and-queue_delayed_work_on-fix.patch applied. > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-19 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 08:55 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:37:12 -0600 Steve Fox wrote: bl6-13, an x86_64 box listed on test.kernel.org, tripped on this during an LTP run, even with unify-queue_delayed_work-and-queue_delayed_work_on-fix.patch applied. I'm not sure

2.6.20-mm1: PTRACE=y, PROC_FS=n compile error

2007-02-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ... Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3: ... +utrace-utrace-ptrace-compat.patch ... utrace tree ... This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n: -- snip -- ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-18 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Cédric Augonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2007/2/17, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Cédric Augonnet wrote: That is my all point actually, i am not telling i have a valid partition. I'm just describing the fact that the minix fs driver is making too many assumptions on the partition

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-18 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/2/17, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Cédric Augonnet wrote: That is my all point actually, i am not telling i have a valid partition. I'm just describing the fact that the minix fs driver is making too many assumptions on the partition it is

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Cédric Augonnet wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > On 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 and 2.6.20-mm1, i get an OOPS when using the minix 3 > file system. I enclose the dmesg and the .config to that mail. > > Here are the steps to reproduce this oo

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Bill Davidsen
Cédric Augonnet wrote: 2007/2/15, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3: -minix-v3-support.patch Hi Daniel, On 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 and 2.6.20-mm1, i get an OOPS when using the m

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Aragonés
On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well i actually do access to this partition, i can edit it and use it, this on Linux. Sorry if this is not clear. Here is the point, I think. I'm afraid that you don't really access any *real* partition. If it were so, that partition

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Daniel Aragonés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It appears that the trouble is in the count_free of file > fs/minix/bitmap.c . This procedure is actually called twice when we > issue a df command. > The point where things start to get

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Aragonés
On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It appears that the trouble is in the count_free of file fs/minix/bitmap.c . This procedure is actually called twice when we issue a df command. The point where things start to get strange is i = ((numbits - (numblocks-1) *

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Daniel Aragonés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Well, a glance at your dmesg doesn' show that a minix partition was recognized. Otherwise it would sow it. So you have not such a partition within your drives. You are using an emulator to run minix. You will have the same problem if you run

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Aragonés
On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Hi Daniel, On 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 and 2.6.20-mm1, i get an OOPS when using the minix 3 file system. I enclose the dmesg and the .config to that mail. Here are the steps to reproduce this oops (they involve using qemu to run M

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 USB-related OOPS

2007-02-17 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
09] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. Hi, Could you try booting without loading the nvidia module? Oopses related to it have been reported for 2.6.20-mm1. See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/428 Regards, Frederik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 USB-related OOPS

2007-02-17 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
'NVIDIA' taints kernel. Hi, Could you try booting without loading the nvidia module? Oopses related to it have been reported for 2.6.20-mm1. See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/428 Regards, Frederik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Aragonés
On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Hi Daniel, On 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 and 2.6.20-mm1, i get an OOPS when using the minix 3 file system. I enclose the dmesg and the .config to that mail. Here are the steps to reproduce this oops (they involve using qemu to run Minix 3) - First

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Daniel Aragonés [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, a glance at your dmesg doesn' show that a minix partition was recognized. Otherwise it would sow it. So you have not such a partition within your drives. You are using an emulator to run minix. You will have the same problem if you run minix2

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Aragonés
On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the trouble is in the count_free of file fs/minix/bitmap.c . This procedure is actually called twice when we issue a df command. The point where things start to get strange is i = ((numbits - (numblocks-1) * bh-b_size

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Daniel Aragonés [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the trouble is in the count_free of file fs/minix/bitmap.c . This procedure is actually called twice when we issue a df command. The point where things start to get strange is

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Aragonés
On 2/17/07, Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well i actually do access to this partition, i can edit it and use it, this on Linux. Sorry if this is not clear. Here is the point, I think. I'm afraid that you don't really access any *real* partition. If it were so, that partition

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Bill Davidsen
Cédric Augonnet wrote: 2007/2/15, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3: -minix-v3-support.patch Hi Daniel, On 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 and 2.6.20-mm1, i get an OOPS when using the minix 3

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - Oops using Minix 3 file system

2007-02-17 Thread Cédric Augonnet
2007/2/17, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Cédric Augonnet wrote: Hi Daniel, On 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 and 2.6.20-mm1, i get an OOPS when using the minix 3 file system. I enclose the dmesg and the .config to that mail. Here are the steps to reproduce this oops (they involve using qemu to run

2.6.20-mm1 USB-related OOPS

2007-02-16 Thread Berck E. Nash
snd_hda_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm snd_mixer_oss snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd 8139too uhci_hcd mii soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 evdev usbcore i2c_core floppy [ 149.587337] Pid: 1620, comm: modprobe Tainted: P 2.6.20-mm1 #3 [ 149.593785] RIP

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:30:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, can't reproduce (the bug, that is). > > Actually, the oops you have there is the fourth one, so we might be seeing > downstream effects of oops #1. Can you please capture the first oops > trace? Increasing

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread James Morris
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Andrew already has this fix which cures it for me. PG_mlocked pages can > be freed in some situations and thus we need the correct handling in the > page allocator: Works for me. - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - undefined reference to `delete_module' on x86

2007-02-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:14:17 -0600 Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Full log at > http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/debug/test.log.0 > Config at > http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/build/dotconfig > > CHK include/linux/compile.h > UPD include/linux/compile.h > CC

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - undefined reference to `delete_module' on x86

2007-02-16 Thread Steve Fox
Full log at http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/debug/test.log.0 Config at http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/build/dotconfig CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:37:12 -0600 Steve Fox wrote: > bl6-13, an x86_64 box listed on test.kernel.org, tripped on this during > an LTP run, even with > unify-queue_delayed_work-and-queue_delayed_work_on-fix.patch applied. > > I'm not sure why the LTP results aren't copied over to TKO, but

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread Steve Fox
rng_core i2c_amd756 i2c_core Pid: 19380, comm: mlockall01 Not tainted 2.6.20-mm1-autokern1 #1 RIP: 0010:[] [] __pagevec_lru_add_mlock+0x6f/0x108 RSP: 0018:810022d0fdd8 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0011006c RBX: 81003ff41000 RCX: 81003ff40dc0 RDX: RSI

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, James Morris wrote: > Then, I get this reliably as ntpd starts up: > [ 92.905514] [] lru_add_drain+0x57/0x8d > [ 92.905519] [] free_pages_and_swap_cache+0x12/0x85 > [ 92.905526] [] unmap_region+0xfd/0x129 > [ 92.905530] [] do_munmap+0x153/0x1b4 > [ 92.905534]

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread James Morris
G at mm/swap.c:469! [ 92.755867] invalid opcode: [#1] [ 92.769975] PREEMPT SMP [ 92.783289] last sysfs file: /devices/pnp0/00:00/id [ 92.798654] Modules linked in: sg pcspkr e1000 [ 92.813994] CPU:2 [ 92.813995] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI [ 92.813997] EFLAGS: 0001000

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread James Morris
fixes it? This just disabled an optimization > to set PageMlocked early. Nope, doesn't fix the problem. > Index: linux-2.6.20-mm1/mm/memory.c > ======= > --- linux-2.6.20-mm1.orig/mm/memory.c 2007-02-15 14:35:41.0 -08

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread James Morris
fix the problem. Index: linux-2.6.20-mm1/mm/memory.c === --- linux-2.6.20-mm1.orig/mm/memory.c 2007-02-15 14:35:41.0 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-mm1/mm/memory.c 2007-02-15 14:35:54.0 -0800 @@ -930,6 +930,8 @@ static

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread James Morris
! [ 92.755867] invalid opcode: [#1] [ 92.769975] PREEMPT SMP [ 92.783289] last sysfs file: /devices/pnp0/00:00/id [ 92.798654] Modules linked in: sg pcspkr e1000 [ 92.813994] CPU:2 [ 92.813995] EIP:0060:[c014e548]Not tainted VLI [ 92.813997] EFLAGS: 00010002 (2.6.20-mm1 #4

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread Steve Fox
rng_core i2c_amd756 i2c_core Pid: 19380, comm: mlockall01 Not tainted 2.6.20-mm1-autokern1 #1 RIP: 0010:[8026e007] [8026e007] __pagevec_lru_add_mlock+0x6f/0x108 RSP: 0018:810022d0fdd8 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0011006c RBX: 81003ff41000 RCX: 81003ff40dc0 RDX

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:37:12 -0600 Steve Fox wrote: bl6-13, an x86_64 box listed on test.kernel.org, tripped on this during an LTP run, even with unify-queue_delayed_work-and-queue_delayed_work_on-fix.patch applied. I'm not sure why the LTP results aren't copied over to TKO, but here's

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - undefined reference to `delete_module' on x86

2007-02-16 Thread Steve Fox
Full log at http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/debug/test.log.0 Config at http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/build/dotconfig CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 - undefined reference to `delete_module' on x86

2007-02-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:14:17 -0600 Steve Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full log at http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/debug/test.log.0 Config at http://test.kernel.org/abat/71719/build/dotconfig CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-16 Thread James Morris
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: Andrew already has this fix which cures it for me. PG_mlocked pages can be freed in some situations and thus we need the correct handling in the page allocator: Works for me. - James -- James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:30:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope, can't reproduce (the bug, that is). Actually, the oops you have there is the fourth one, so we might be seeing downstream effects of oops #1. Can you please capture the first oops trace? Increasing the log

2.6.20-mm1 USB-related OOPS

2007-02-16 Thread Berck E. Nash
snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm snd_mixer_oss snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd 8139too uhci_hcd mii soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 evdev usbcore i2c_core floppy [ 149.587337] Pid: 1620, comm: modprobe Tainted: P 2.6.20-mm1 #3

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:39:12 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ee1394 usblp evdev > > > CPU:1 > > > EIP:0060:[]Tainted: P VLI > > > EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.20-jam01 #1) > > > EIP is at sysfs_lookup+0x5b/0x20a > > > eax: f6707118 ebx: f6b33e5c ecx:

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:37:39 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For what reason was that change made? > > > > It was made so that we can use the markers in C code without actually > including marker.h everywhere. I am sure someone has a better way to do > it : I would be

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:46:56 -0500 > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Me too. It's due to the linux-kernel-markers patches. Mathieu, can you > > > take a look please? > > > > I will give a deeper look in sparse, but I should say

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
Temporarily at > >>> > >>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > >>> > >>> Will appear later at > >>> > >>> > >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ > >&g

Re: [-mm patch] pci_iomap_regions error handling fix (was Re: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:41:59 + Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > > Hi, > > It appear

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:46:56 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Me too. It's due to the linux-kernel-markers patches. Mathieu, can you > > take a look please? > > I will give a deeper look in sparse, but I should say up front that I > add this to the root build tree

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
> > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100 "J.A. Magall__n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-m

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100 > Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton napisa__(a): >>> Temporarily at >>> >>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ >>> >>> Will a

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:01:27 +0100 > Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes > > on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c: > > > > CHECK arch

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Thursday 15 February 2007 14:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > - The IDE tree got dropped due to various linkage problems Doh, I guess this is what one gets for not testing modular IDE driver support properly. :( All linkage problems should be fixed now, sorry for that. Bart - To unsubscribe from

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:01:27 +0100 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes > on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c: > > CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c > linux/marker.h: No such file or directory > include/linux

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's shm-make-sysv-ipc-shared-memory-use-stacked-files.patch, brought to > us by Eric-who-hasnt-read-Documentation/SubmitChecklist. Sorry I thought I had all of the interesting debugging enabled in my kernel build. It must of fallen out someplace.

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread Christoph Lameter
as allocated and marked PageMlocked and then some later processing put it onto the LRU? Maybe try_to_set_mlocked does work some havoc here. Could you see if this patch fixes it? This just disabled an optimization to set PageMlocked early. Index: linux-2.6.20-mm1

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton napisa__(a): > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.k

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
ked in: > [ 75.300193] CPU:0 > [ 75.300195] EIP:0060:[] Not tainted VLI > [ 75.300197] EFLAGS: 00210006 (2.6.20-mm1 #1) > [ 75.341750] EIP is at __pagevec_lru_add_active+0x76/0xcc > [ 75.356722] eax: 80100060 ebx: c1bf9c48 ecx: c1e345bc edx: 0001 > [

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 20:29 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > [...] > > - The sony-laptop driver has been disabled due to disagreement between > > the git-acpi and git-backlight trees > > Snigh... I though Richard had something to

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] > - The sony-laptop driver has been disabled due to disagreement between > the git-acpi and git-backlight trees Snigh... I though Richard had something to fix sony-laptop. Am I wrong? -- mattia :wq! - To unsubscribe from

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:00 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia czwartek, 15 lutego 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 PST, Andrew Morton said: > > > git-backlight.patch contains this: > > > > +config BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR > > + tristate "Frontpath ProGear

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia czwartek, 15 lutego 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 PST, Andrew Morton said: > git-backlight.patch contains this: > > +config BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR > + tristate "Frontpath ProGear Backlight Driver" > + depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE && PCI && X86 >

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 PST, Andrew Morton said: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ git-backlight.pa

[-mm patch] pci_iomap_regions error handling fix (was Re: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > Hi, It appears that the pcim_iomap_regions() function doesn't get the error handling right. It BUGs early at boot with a backtrace

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Andrew Morton wrote: - The UBI tree got dropped due to probable lack of a git sync with mainline (ie: it's a 13.5MB diff whcih doesn't apply very well) Andrew, I apologize for this. Now it is fixed. It somehow got screwed when I re-based it from mtd-2.6.git to linu-2.6.git. Please, do not

sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c: CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c linux/marker.h: No such file or directory include/linux/jiffies.h:18:5: warning: undefined preprocessor identifier 'CONFIG_HZ' include/linux/jiffies.h:20:7: warning

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, James Morris wrote: > Hit a BUG() via lvm: Also, I just disabled paravirt ops and saw the same bug, so it's not that stuff. -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread James Morris
swap.c:442! [ 75.244589] invalid opcode: [#1] [ 75.258693] PREEMPT SMP [ 75.271894] last sysfs file: /block/ram0/dev [ 75.286734] Modules linked in: [ 75.300193] CPU:0 [ 75.300195] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI [ 75.300197] EFLAGS: 00210006 (2.6.20-mm1 #1) [ 75.3

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread James Morris
! [ 75.244589] invalid opcode: [#1] [ 75.258693] PREEMPT SMP [ 75.271894] last sysfs file: /block/ram0/dev [ 75.286734] Modules linked in: [ 75.300193] CPU:0 [ 75.300195] EIP:0060:[c0150303]Not tainted VLI [ 75.300197] EFLAGS: 00210006 (2.6.20-mm1 #1) [ 75.341750] EIP

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, James Morris wrote: Hit a BUG() via lvm: Also, I just disabled paravirt ops and saw the same bug, so it's not that stuff. -- James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /mnt/md0/devel/linux-mm/mm/slab.c

sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c: CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c linux/marker.h: No such file or directory include/linux/jiffies.h:18:5: warning: undefined preprocessor identifier 'CONFIG_HZ' include/linux/jiffies.h:20:7: warning

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Andrew Morton wrote: - The UBI tree got dropped due to probable lack of a git sync with mainline (ie: it's a 13.5MB diff whcih doesn't apply very well) Andrew, I apologize for this. Now it is fixed. It somehow got screwed when I re-based it from mtd-2.6.git to linu-2.6.git. Please, do not

[-mm patch] pci_iomap_regions error handling fix (was Re: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Hi, It appears that the pcim_iomap_regions() function doesn't get the error handling right. It BUGs early at boot with a backtrace along the lines of: ahci_init

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 PST, Andrew Morton said: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ git-backlight.patch contains this: +config BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia czwartek, 15 lutego 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 PST, Andrew Morton said: git-backlight.patch contains this: +config BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR + tristate Frontpath ProGear Backlight Driver + depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE PCI X86 +

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:00 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Dnia czwartek, 15 lutego 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 PST, Andrew Morton said: git-backlight.patch contains this: +config BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR + tristate Frontpath ProGear Backlight Driver

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] - The sony-laptop driver has been disabled due to disagreement between the git-acpi and git-backlight trees Snigh... I though Richard had something to fix sony-laptop. Am I wrong? -- mattia :wq! - To unsubscribe from this

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 20:29 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] - The sony-laptop driver has been disabled due to disagreement between the git-acpi and git-backlight trees Snigh... I though Richard had something to fix

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ Oops plague for me :(. A lot like

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
]Not tainted VLI [ 75.300197] EFLAGS: 00210006 (2.6.20-mm1 #1) [ 75.341750] EIP is at __pagevec_lru_add_active+0x76/0xcc [ 75.356722] eax: 80100060 ebx: c1bf9c48 ecx: c1e345bc edx: 0001 [ 75.373139] esi: c03dc680 edi: c1c4e780 ebp: f7ce3f34 esp: f7ce3f24 [ 75.389642

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napisa__(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's shm-make-sysv-ipc-shared-memory-use-stacked-files.patch, brought to us by Eric-who-hasnt-read-Documentation/SubmitChecklist. Sorry I thought I had all of the interesting debugging enabled in my kernel build. It must of fallen out someplace. I

Re: 2.6.20-mm1 [kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:442]

2007-02-15 Thread Christoph Lameter
PageMlocked and then some later processing put it onto the LRU? Maybe try_to_set_mlocked does work some havoc here. Could you see if this patch fixes it? This just disabled an optimization to set PageMlocked early. Index: linux-2.6.20-mm1/mm/memory.c

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:01:27 +0100 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c: CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c linux/marker.h: No such file or directory include/linux/jiffies.h:18:5: warning

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Thursday 15 February 2007 14:14, Andrew Morton wrote: - The IDE tree got dropped due to various linkage problems Doh, I guess this is what one gets for not testing modular IDE driver support properly. :( All linkage problems should be fixed now, sorry for that. Bart - To unsubscribe from

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:01:27 +0100 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c: CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c linux/marker.h: No such file

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napisa__(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100 J.A. Magall__n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ Oops plague for me :(. A lot like this: ee1394 usblp evdev CPU:1 EIP:0060:[c0195f12]Tainted: P VLI EFLAGS: 00010246

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:46:56 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Me too. It's due to the linux-kernel-markers patches. Mathieu, can you take a look please? I will give a deeper look in sparse, but I should say up front that I add this to the root build tree Makefile :

Re: [-mm patch] pci_iomap_regions error handling fix (was Re: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:41:59 + Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Hi, It appears that the pcim_iomap_regions() function doesn't get the error

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:24:35 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napisa__(a): On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napisa__(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:46:56 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Me too. It's due to the linux-kernel-markers patches. Mathieu, can you take a look please? I will give a deeper look in sparse, but I should say up front that I

Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)

2007-02-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:37:39 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what reason was that change made? It was made so that we can use the markers in C code without actually including marker.h everywhere. I am sure someone has a better way to do it : I would be happy to use

  1   2   >