Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-03-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 23 February 2007 17:36, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 > > > > > RIP: > > > > > [] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 > > The bug isn't in rtc_cmos,

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-03-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 23 February 2007 17:36, David Brownell wrote: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 RIP: [804032c3] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 The bug isn't in rtc_cmos, but

2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request not git-block.patch's fault

2007-02-28 Thread Oliver Pahl
cryptomgr crypto_algapi ieee80211 _crypt_wep ipw2200 ieee80211 ieee80211_crypt sk98lin intel_agp agpgart CPU:0 EIP:0060:[]Tainted: P VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.20-mm2 #4) EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2d7 eax: ebx: ecx: edx: 00010585 esi: dff497d4

2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request not git-block.patches fault

2007-02-28 Thread Oliver Pahl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I rebuild the kernel, without the git-block patches Patches revert-md-avoid-possible-bug_on-in-md-bitmap-handling-for-git-block.patch git-block.patch git-block-fixup.patch git-block-dupe-definitions.patch git-block-xfs-barriers-broke.patch but i

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-28 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:25:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, all, > > > > I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on > > x86_64. Wi

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-28 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:25:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies

2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request not git-block.patches fault

2007-02-28 Thread Oliver Pahl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I rebuild the kernel, without the git-block patches Patches revert-md-avoid-possible-bug_on-in-md-bitmap-handling-for-git-block.patch git-block.patch git-block-fixup.patch git-block-dupe-definitions.patch git-block-xfs-barriers-broke.patch but i

2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request not git-block.patch's fault

2007-02-28 Thread Oliver Pahl
cryptomgr crypto_algapi ieee80211 _crypt_wep ipw2200 ieee80211 ieee80211_crypt sk98lin intel_agp agpgart CPU:0 EIP:0060:[c01f369b]Tainted: P VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.20-mm2 #4) EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2d7 eax: ebx: ecx: edx: 00010585 esi

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, all, > > I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on > x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: > > In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:5

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: include/asm/io_apic.h:61: error

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-25 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: include/asm/io_apic.h:61: error: "MAX_IO_APICS" undeclared here (not in a function) Not sure how n

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-25 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: include/asm/io_apic.h:61: error: MAX_IO_APICS undeclared here (not in a function) Not sure how nobody else

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-23 Thread David Brownell
> > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 > > > > RIP: > > > > [] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 The bug isn't in rtc_cmos, but that's the only driver that would currently show the bug.

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-23 Thread David Brownell
rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 RIP: [804032c3] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 The bug isn't in rtc_cmos, but that's the only driver that would currently show the bug.

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:33 am, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Unfortunately, the userland shipped with OpenSUSE refuses to talk to the new > one (or I don't know how to make it do that). Did your "udev" create a /dev/rtc0? If not, /sys/class/rtc-dev/rtc0/dev will give the right major/minor

2.6.20-mm2 CONFIG_ACPI_BAY=y: undefined reference to `is_dock_device'

2007-02-22 Thread Andreas Mohr
]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.20-mm2' Famous last words: CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=m... Andreas Mohr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo inf

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 04:57, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. > > > > Yes (mistakenly). > > Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to > assume that

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 04:57, David Brownell wrote: On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. Yes (mistakenly). Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to assume that oopsing is

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:33 am, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Unfortunately, the userland shipped with OpenSUSE refuses to talk to the new one (or I don't know how to make it do that). Did your udev create a /dev/rtc0? If not, /sys/class/rtc-dev/rtc0/dev will give the right major/minor

2.6.20-mm2 CONFIG_ACPI_BAY=y: undefined reference to `is_dock_device'

2007-02-22 Thread Andreas Mohr
]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.20-mm2' Famous last words: CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=m... Andreas Mohr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-21 Thread Oliver Pahl
Is this Problem still investigated? I got the same kernel bug a few minutes after booting my system with 2.6.20-mm2. As a student i am not yet as familiar with kernel programming as i want to be, but i will try, i promise. In the meantime, i always try to test the newest mm patches, and i have

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-21 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. > > Yes (mistakenly). Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to assume that oopsing is the wrong response to "user" mistakes. ;) Legacy drivers can be

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-21 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. Yes (mistakenly). Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to assume that oopsing is the wrong response to user mistakes. ;) Legacy drivers can be such

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-21 Thread Oliver Pahl
Is this Problem still investigated? I got the same kernel bug a few minutes after booting my system with 2.6.20-mm2. As a student i am not yet as familiar with kernel programming as i want to be, but i will try, i promise. In the meantime, i always try to test the newest mm patches, and i have

2.6.20-mm2 -- tifm/0/1919 is trying to release lock (>lock) at: [] tifm_7xx1_switch_media+0x2e9/0x326 [tifm_7xx1]

2007-02-20 Thread Miles Lane
Hello, When I pull my SD card out of my laptop, I get the following: tifm_7xx1: demand removing card from socket 3 = [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] - tifm/0/1919 is trying to release lock (>lock) at: []

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.02.2007 22:23 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems: > > = > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > 2.6.20-mm2 #6 > - > beagled/4786

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
t;Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > > > > > http://userweb.ke

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 06:13, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > One more thing: > > > > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: FWIW, with CONFIG_PREEMPT unset (CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is set instead), I'm unable to reproduce this problem on the box on which it is readily reproducible with CONFIG_PREEMPT set. I'm not surprised... I routinely tell people to turn it off, when debugging a

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Looks like reiserf

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
auid=4294967295 > > > > > general protection fault: [2] PREEMPT > > > > > last sysfs file: /class/net/eth2/carrier > > > > > CPU 0 > > > > > Modules linked in: af_packet ipv6 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq > > > > > snd_seq_devic

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
unix Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642136] CPU:0 Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642139] EIP:0060:[] Not tainted VLI Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642144] EFLAGS: 00010297 (2.6.20-mm2 #1) Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642172] EIP is at __make_request+0x141/0x390

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
i2c_isa uhci_hcd soundcore ide_cd i2c_core usbcore shpchp pci_hotplug via_agp 8139cp 8139too mii cdrom parport_pc parport agpgart evdev unix CPU:0 EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210282 (2.6.20-mm2 #1) EIP is at bio_attempt_back_merge+0x22/0x70 eax: dbc62844 ebx: db4968f4 ecx

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andrew Morton wrote: > - Judging by the number of times I get asked "is there a git tree for -mm", > nobody is reading the boilerplate. Here it is again: The git tree version of -mm seems to be sick. A fetch of the tag gives you something but it is "significantly" (200k lines of diff) away

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andrew Morton wrote: - Judging by the number of times I get asked is there a git tree for -mm, nobody is reading the boilerplate. Here it is again: The git tree version of -mm seems to be sick. A fetch of the tag gives you something but it is significantly (200k lines of diff) away from

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
i2c_isa uhci_hcd soundcore ide_cd i2c_core usbcore shpchp pci_hotplug via_agp 8139cp 8139too mii cdrom parport_pc parport agpgart evdev unix CPU:0 EIP:0060:[c01ec662]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210282 (2.6.20-mm2 #1) EIP is at bio_attempt_back_merge+0x22/0x70 eax: dbc62844 ebx: db4968f4

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
unix Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642136] CPU:0 Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642139] EIP:0060:[c01ede81] Not tainted VLI Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642144] EFLAGS: 00010297 (2.6.20-mm2 #1) Feb 20 12:18:36 maciek kernel: [ 1443.642172] EIP is at __make_request

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 06:13, David Brownell wrote: On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more thing: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.02.2007 22:23 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems: = [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.20-mm2 #6 - beagled/4786 is trying to acquire lock

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
2.6.20-mm2 #1 RIP: 0010:[8034bce4] [8034bce4] __make_request+0x134/0x370 RSP: :81005ed659a0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: 0203396a RDX: 0001 RSI: 810037b4dbb0 RDI: 81004683d8c0 RBP

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: FWIW, with CONFIG_PREEMPT unset (CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is set instead), I'm unable to reproduce this problem on the box on which it is readily reproducible with CONFIG_PREEMPT set. I'm not surprised... I routinely tell people to turn it off, when debugging a

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Two problems: 1

2.6.20-mm2 -- tifm/0/1919 is trying to release lock (fm-lock) at: [f90d392f] tifm_7xx1_switch_media+0x2e9/0x326 [tifm_7xx1]

2007-02-20 Thread Miles Lane
Hello, When I pull my SD card out of my laptop, I get the following: tifm_7xx1: demand removing card from socket 3 = [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] - tifm/0/1919 is trying to release lock (fm-lock) at: [f90d392f]

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Andrew Morton
t; > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
eth2/carrier > > CPU 0 > > Modules linked in: af_packet ipv6 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq > > snd_seq_device asus_acpi backlight button battery ac dm_mod pcmr > > Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 > > RIP: 0010:[] [] > > __make_request+0x134/0x

2.6.20-mm2: BLOCK=n compile error

2007-02-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 09:51:46PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.20-mm1: >... > git-block.patch >... > git trees >... This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_BLOCK=n: <-- snip --> ... CC kernel/sched.o /home/bunk/linux/

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
> CPU 0 > > > > Modules linked in: af_packet ipv6 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq > > > > snd_seq_device asus_acpi backlight button battery ac dm_mod pcmr > > > > Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 > > > > RIP: 0010:[]

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:28, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Feb 18 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 > > OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo > thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Michal Piotrowski napisał(a): > > Hi Frederik, > > > > On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Michal, > >> > >> This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() > >> should be

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
b 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > > > >> > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a ?crit

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss evdev snd_pcm skge intel_agp snd_timer agpgart snd 8139too soundcore sk98lin i2c_i801 mii snd_page_alloc ide_cd cdrom rtc unix CPU: 0 EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.20-mm2 #19) EIP is at blk_unplu

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the q->queue_lock held. Could you try the following patch? It silenced the oops for me. For me too, but Jens

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
rote: > > > > > >> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > > >> > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a ?crit : > > >> > >Temporarily at > > >> > > > > >> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~a

[-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
Riffard wrote: > >> > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a �crit : > >> > >Temporarily at > >> > > > >> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > >> > > > >> > >Will appear later at > >>

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
[2] PREEMPT > > last sysfs file: /class/net/eth2/carrier > > CPU 0 > > Modules linked in: af_packet ipv6 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device asus_acpi backlight button battery ac dm_mod pcmr > > Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 > > RI

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:29, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
eth2/carrier > > CPU 0 > > Modules linked in: af_packet ipv6 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq > > snd_seq_device asus_acpi backlight button battery ac dm_mod pcmr > > Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 > > RIP: 0010:[] [] > > __make_request+0x134/0x

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:29, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
button battery ac dm_mod pcmr Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 RIP: 0010:[8034bce4] [8034bce4] __make_request+0x134/0x370 RSP: :81005ed659a0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: 0203396a RDX: 0001

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device asus_acpi backlight button battery ac dm_mod pcmr Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 RIP: 0010:[8034bce4] [8034bce4] __make_request+0x134/0x370 RSP: :81005ed659a0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: RBX

[-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
Morton a �crit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Hello, I've got a fully reproducible Oops. I just have to boot to runlevel 2 and wait

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a ?crit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Hello, I've got a fully

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the q-queue_lock held. Could you try the following patch? It silenced the oops for me. For me too, but Jens dislikes

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
evdev snd_pcm skge intel_agp snd_timer agpgart snd 8139too soundcore sk98lin i2c_i801 mii snd_page_alloc ide_cd cdrom rtc unix CPU:0 EIP:0060:[c01f3f12]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.20-mm2 #19) EIP is at blk_unplug_current+0x60/0x156 eax: f3f97298 ebx: 0001 ecx

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a ?crit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Michal Piotrowski napisał(a): Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Feb 18 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it asap. Will

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:28, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

2.6.20-mm2: BLOCK=n compile error

2007-02-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 09:51:46PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ... Changes since 2.6.20-mm1: ... git-block.patch ... git trees ... This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_BLOCK=n: -- snip -- ... CC kernel/sched.o /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-mm2/kernel

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
: /class/net/eth2/carrier CPU 0 Modules linked in: af_packet ipv6 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device asus_acpi backlight button battery ac dm_mod pcmr Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 RIP: 0010:[8034bce4] [8034bce4

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
button battery ac dm_mod pcmr Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 RIP: 0010:[8034bce4] [8034bce4] __make_request+0x134/0x370 RSP: :81005ed659a0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: 0203396a RDX: 0001

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Andrew Morton
: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Two problems: 1) A showstopper with the root partition on RAID1: md: raid1 personality

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > One more thing: > > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Will appear

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Will appear

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
light button battery ac dm_mod pcmr > Pid: 178, comm: pdflush Not tainted 2.6.20-mm2 #1 > RIP: 0010:[] [] > __make_request+0x134/0x370 > RSP: :81005ed659a0 EFLAGS: 00010297 > RAX: RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: 0203396a > RDX: 00010

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
ton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ I think something like

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ One more thing: rtc_cmos

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it asap. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
c pcmcia_core snd soundcore ipw2200 > ieee80211 ieee80211_crypt firmware_class rtc snd_page_alloc iTCO_wdt > iTCO_vendor_support shpchp pci_hotplug sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ohci1394 > ieee1394 8139too mii ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan unix > CPU:0 > EIP:0060:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
mporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > > >Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Hello, I've got a fully reproducibl

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : > > >Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.or

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Will appear

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > Slab corruption + oops yablb (yet another block layer bug) Slab corruption: start=f3b8f654, len=176 Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071. Last user: [](mempool_free_slab+0xe/0x10) 060: 6b 6b 6b

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : > >Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > >Will appear later at > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/ker

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Two problems: 1)

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Two problems: 1) A showstopper with the root partition

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Hello

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Slab corruption + oops yablb (yet another block layer bug) Slab corruption: start=f3b8f654, len=176 Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071. Last user: [c0160f39](mempool_free_slab+0xe/0x10) 060: 6b 6b 6b 6b 00

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Hello, I've got a fully reproducible Oops. I just have to boot to runlevel 2 and wait less than one minute. Maybe this oops is related too? Looks that way. Can't

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
iTCO_vendor_support shpchp pci_hotplug sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ohci1394 ieee1394 8139too mii ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan unix CPU:0 EIP:0060:[c01f238c]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.20-mm2 #13) EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee Looks fairly similar. I

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it asap. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

  1   2   >