Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I
can provide an updated version when a new 2.6.20 kernel is released?
they should be generated the way you did: apply the 2.6.20 baseline -rt
kernel patch to the later patches and fix up
* John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sure, i can put it there.
>
> Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I
> can provide an updated version when a new 2.6.20 kernel is released?
they should be generated the way you did: apply the 2.6.20 baseline -rt
kernel patch
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
I'd be happy to generate a clean patch!
(Would you agree to host it in your directory?)
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/older/
sure, i can put it there.
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I can
provide an
* John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be happy to generate a clean patch!
> (Would you agree to host it in your directory?)
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/older/
sure, i can put it there.
> 3. linux/kernel/futex.c
> [ I'm not sure I've made the appropriate changes here ]
>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
The unified diff is attached to this message.
thanks - this is useful to those who are not that much on the bleeding
edge.
I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
78 hunks had to
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
The unified diff is attached to this message.
thanks - this is useful to those who are not that much on the bleeding
edge.
I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
78 hunks had to
* John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be happy to generate a clean patch!
(Would you agree to host it in your directory?)
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/older/
sure, i can put it there.
3. linux/kernel/futex.c
[ I'm not sure I've made the appropriate changes here ]
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
I'd be happy to generate a clean patch!
(Would you agree to host it in your directory?)
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/older/
sure, i can put it there.
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I can
provide an
* John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure, i can put it there.
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I
can provide an updated version when a new 2.6.20 kernel is released?
they should be generated the way you did: apply the 2.6.20 baseline -rt
kernel patch to the
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I
can provide an updated version when a new 2.6.20 kernel is released?
they should be generated the way you did: apply the 2.6.20 baseline -rt
kernel patch to the later patches and fix up
* John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
>
> The unified diff is attached to this message.
thanks - this is useful to those who are not that much on the bleeding
edge.
> I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
Hello,
I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
The unified diff is attached to this message.
I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
78 hunks had to be offset and 3 hunks had to be fuzzed.
$ grep -B1 fuzz patch.log
patching file arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c
Hello,
I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
The unified diff is attached to this message.
I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
78 hunks had to be offset and 3 hunks had to be fuzzed.
$ grep -B1 fuzz patch.log
patching file arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c
* John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
The unified diff is attached to this message.
thanks - this is useful to those who are not that much on the bleeding
edge.
I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
78
14 matches
Mail list logo
