Andi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:20:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
> >
> > Can we
Andi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:20:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to
Will,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:05:31PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
> >The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
> >the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
> >created by the autogen.sh.
> >
> >The oprofile patch doesn't build if
William Cohen wrote:
Hello Stephane,
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are configured without the
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:29:32 -0800
Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:05:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > I have released another version of the perfmon new code
Andrew,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:05:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
>
> Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
Could
Andrew,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:05:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
Could you
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:29:32 -0800
Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:05:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
William Cohen wrote:
Hello Stephane,
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are configured without the
Will,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:05:31PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
>
> Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
You mean "big" push? :)
FWIW I ran 2.6.17.8 kernels for
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
>
> Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
Yes, there certainly seems to be
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64 architectures
-
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64 architectures
-
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
Yes, there certainly seems to be user interest
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please?
You mean big push? :)
FWIW I ran 2.6.17.8 kernels for weeks with the
20 matches
Mail list logo
