Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm2: PG_booked and PG_readahead

2007-03-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:18:44 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [applogies in advance if this has already been asked] > > I note that PG_booked and PG_readahead are both using bit 20 in > 2.6.21-rc3-mm2. Is this intentional or perhaps a miss-merge. They do > not sound obviously

2.6.21-rc3-mm2: PG_booked and PG_readahead

2007-03-19 Thread Andy Whitcroft
[applogies in advance if this has already been asked] I note that PG_booked and PG_readahead are both using bit 20 in 2.6.21-rc3-mm2. Is this intentional or perhaps a miss-merge. They do not sound obviously non-overlapping to my mind. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

2.6.21-rc3-mm2: PG_booked and PG_readahead

2007-03-19 Thread Andy Whitcroft
[applogies in advance if this has already been asked] I note that PG_booked and PG_readahead are both using bit 20 in 2.6.21-rc3-mm2. Is this intentional or perhaps a miss-merge. They do not sound obviously non-overlapping to my mind. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm2: PG_booked and PG_readahead

2007-03-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:18:44 + Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [applogies in advance if this has already been asked] I note that PG_booked and PG_readahead are both using bit 20 in 2.6.21-rc3-mm2. Is this intentional or perhaps a miss-merge. They do not sound obviously