On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:39:15 +
Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you explain "this is bug" for me. The routine was __init_refok and
> therefore ! __init and therefore always present. The logic there must
> guarentee it only calls the bootmem allocator in early boot, and the
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:29:19PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
>
> This patch fixes following bugs
> ==
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
> ind_e820_area (between 'init_memory_mapping' and
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:56:57 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eek.
>
> What I now need to do with this patch is
>
> - Work out which patches in -mm it is actually fixing.
>
> - If that is more than one patch then split this patch up into multiple ones.
>
> - Stage the one or
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:29:19 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
>
> This patch fixes following bugs
> ==
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
> ind_e820_area (between
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:29:19 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
This patch fixes following bugs
==
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
ind_e820_area (between
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:56:57 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eek.
What I now need to do with this patch is
- Work out which patches in -mm it is actually fixing.
- If that is more than one patch then split this patch up into multiple ones.
- Stage the one or more fixup
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:29:19PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
This patch fixes following bugs
==
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
ind_e820_area (between 'init_memory_mapping' and
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:39:15 +
Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you explain this is bug for me. The routine was __init_refok and
therefore ! __init and therefore always present. The logic there must
guarentee it only calls the bootmem allocator in early boot, and the logic
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:29:19PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
>
> This patch fixes following bugs
> ==
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
> ind_e820_area (between 'init_memory_mapping' and
Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
This patch fixes following bugs
==
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
ind_e820_area (between 'init_memory_mapping' and 'arch_add_memory')
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x946b5): Section mismatch:
Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
This patch fixes following bugs
==
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
ind_e820_area (between 'init_memory_mapping' and 'arch_add_memory')
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x946b5): Section mismatch:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:29:19PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Fixes for memory hotplug compile and .section handling.
This patch fixes following bugs
==
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1d07c): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:f
ind_e820_area (between 'init_memory_mapping' and
12 matches
Mail list logo