On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 22:42 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Perhaps it just can't find the root filesystem at all?
Indeed - thanks for the input.
My supposed "good" source config didn't match the running kernel. A
"work in progress" I had obviously forgotten about.
Apologies for having
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 22:42 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Perhaps it just can't find the root filesystem at all?
Indeed - thanks for the input.
My supposed good source config didn't match the running kernel. A
work in progress I had obviously forgotten about.
Apologies for having disturbed
On Wednesday, 14 of November 2007, Shane wrote:
> New guy to this list. Long time lurker on CKRM - decided to test the
> control groups patches.
> Pulled 2.6.24.rc4 patch and migrated my (working) 2.6.23-rc4 config.
>
> Panic'd because of NFS root not found - not too surprising as I don't
> have
New guy to this list. Long time lurker on CKRM - decided to test the
control groups patches.
Pulled 2.6.24.rc4 patch and migrated my (working) 2.6.23-rc4 config.
Panic'd because of NFS root not found - not too surprising as I don't
have one.
Any ideas why this option comes up selected ???. Same
New guy to this list. Long time lurker on CKRM - decided to test the
control groups patches.
Pulled 2.6.24.rc4 patch and migrated my (working) 2.6.23-rc4 config.
Panic'd because of NFS root not found - not too surprising as I don't
have one.
Any ideas why this option comes up selected ???. Same
On Wednesday, 14 of November 2007, Shane wrote:
New guy to this list. Long time lurker on CKRM - decided to test the
control groups patches.
Pulled 2.6.24.rc4 patch and migrated my (working) 2.6.23-rc4 config.
Panic'd because of NFS root not found - not too surprising as I don't
have one.
6 matches
Mail list logo
