Re: 3.11.0-rc4 (Linus GIT) -- WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89()

2013-08-05 Thread yun wang
Hi, Miles On 08/06/2013 12:30 PM, Miles Lane wrote: I am not seeing any problems in the behavior of the computer, but wonder if this indicates something that needs fixing. [1.969109] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89() According to the

3.11.0-rc4 (Linus GIT) -- WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89()

2013-08-05 Thread Miles Lane
I am not seeing any problems in the behavior of the computer, but wonder if this indicates something that needs fixing. [1.969109] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89() [1.969121] NO_HZ FULL will not work with unstable sched clock [

3.11.0-rc4 (Linus GIT) -- WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89()

2013-08-05 Thread Miles Lane
I am not seeing any problems in the behavior of the computer, but wonder if this indicates something that needs fixing. [1.969109] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89() [1.969121] NO_HZ FULL will not work with unstable sched clock [

Re: 3.11.0-rc4 (Linus GIT) -- WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89()

2013-08-05 Thread yun wang
Hi, Miles On 08/06/2013 12:30 PM, Miles Lane wrote: I am not seeing any problems in the behavior of the computer, but wonder if this indicates something that needs fixing. [1.969109] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:185 can_stop_full_tick+0x7e/0x89() According to the