Problem is not fixed with your patch. Debugging packet is
http://patrec.com./rico/vger/diag002.tar.bz2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 02:44:03AM -0600, Rico Tudor wrote:
> > Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
> > imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
> >
> No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
The highmem changes in 2.4.2ac3 has a couple
> No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
Curiouser and curiouser. The 3ware does have some known problems but you'd
see those equally on any SMP 1Ggig/4Gig/64Gig.
> While operating this Thunder 2500 (Tyan motherboard, ServerWorks chipset)
> is like walking on a
> Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
> imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
>
No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
While operating this Thunder 2500 (Tyan motherboard, ServerWorks chipset)
is like walking on a minefield, the
Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
While operating this Thunder 2500 (Tyan motherboard, ServerWorks chipset)
is like walking on a minefield, the problem
No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
Curiouser and curiouser. The 3ware does have some known problems but you'd
see those equally on any SMP 1Ggig/4Gig/64Gig.
While operating this Thunder 2500 (Tyan motherboard, ServerWorks chipset)
is like walking on a
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 02:44:03AM -0600, Rico Tudor wrote:
Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
The highmem changes in 2.4.2ac3 has a couple of bugs,
Problem is not fixed with your patch. Debugging packet is
http://patrec.com./rico/vger/diag002.tar.bz2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
> Hypothesis:
> Code to handle PAE has buggy spinlock management.
Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Subject: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2
Problem:
The 64GB option causes processes to spin in the kernel.
Setup:
Linux 2.4.2
Slack current 20-feb-2001
ServerWorks III HE
4GB main memory
dual 933 Piii: SL47Q (stepping 3), SL4KK (stepping 6)
gcc
Subject: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2
Problem:
The 64GB option causes processes to spin in the kernel.
Setup:
Linux 2.4.2
Slack current 20-feb-2001
ServerWorks III HE
4GB main memory
dual 933 Piii: SL47Q (stepping 3), SL4KK (stepping 6)
gcc
Hypothesis:
Code to handle PAE has buggy spinlock management.
Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo