Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list >>> and we'll review it. >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> Now that I'm

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list >> and we'll review it. >> >> Thanks. > > Now that I'm back in front of a

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list >> and we'll review it. >> >> Thanks. > > Now that I'm back in front of a proper screen/keyboard I've been > looking

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list > and we'll review it. > > Thanks. Now that I'm back in front of a proper screen/keyboard I've been looking over your patch and while you are very

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list > and we'll review it. > > Thanks. Now that I'm back in front of a proper screen/keyboard I've been looking over your patch and while you are very right in that the

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list and we'll review it. Thanks. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com On April 27, 2017 7:41:45 PM Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Thu,

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

In that case please send a proper inline patch to the audit mailing list and we'll review it. Thanks. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com On April 27, 2017 7:41:45 PM Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >>>

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Thanks for the

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. I'm

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. >>> I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. >> I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything >>

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. >> I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything >> obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. > I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything > obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears that the problem is > when

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. > I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything > obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears that the problem is > when get_net() goes to bump the

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. > I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything > obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears that the problem is > when

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. > I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything > obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears that the problem is > when get_net() goes to

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if anyone else already reported this, but I randomly get > the following kernel crash during boot (Fedora 18, I know it's pretty > old!!): > > [ 20.940715] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if anyone else already reported this, but I randomly get > the following kernel crash during boot (Fedora 18, I know it's pretty > old!!): > > [ 20.940715] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference > at

Boot regression caused by kauditd

Hi, I don't know if anyone else already reported this, but I randomly get the following kernel crash during boot (Fedora 18, I know it's pretty old!!): [ 20.940715] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0004 [ 20.942122] IP: get_net+0x7/0xd [ 20.942739] PGD 0

Boot regression caused by kauditd

Hi, I don't know if anyone else already reported this, but I randomly get the following kernel crash during boot (Fedora 18, I know it's pretty old!!): [ 20.940715] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0004 [ 20.942122] IP: get_net+0x7/0xd [ 20.942739] PGD 0