Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:50:53AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > PPC guys: this is a gratuitous renaming change that is not required.
> > If you have been following the "CML1 cleanup patch" thread, you see that
> > Eric is blindly dictating policy when he says that CONFIG_[0-9]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:50:53AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> esr wrote:
> > (3) Fix up 10 configuration symbols of the form CONFIG_[0-9]*; specific
> > changes are those suggested 8 Jan 2001 by PPC port maintainer Tom Rini.
> > This change has been APPROVED by an authorized maintainer.
esr wrote:
> OK, since peoples' territorial instincts have started to lather up,
> I guess I'm going to have to do this the hard way...
"Split up your patch" still apparently hasn't filtered into your head.
Since that is more difficult than posting a single patch, I would say
you are doing it th
Bjorn Wesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > (2) Fix up 20 cris-architecture configuration symbols lacking a CONFIG_
> > prefix, so they obey CML1/CML2 conventions and can be detected by
> > `make dep', also static-analysis tools and consistency checke
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> (2) Fix up 20 cris-architecture configuration symbols lacking a CONFIG_
> prefix, so they obey CML1/CML2 conventions and can be detected by
> `make dep', also static-analysis tools and consistency checkers.
> This is a BUG FIX in CML1.
No
OK, since peoples' territorial instincts have started to lather up,
I guess I'm going to have to do this the hard way...
This file is a patch expressed in two ways. First, procedurally, as a
way to duplicate its effects on any kernel source tree. Secondly, as
an explicit patch against 2.4.3-pre
6 matches
Mail list logo
