On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:00:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>
> > Actually I think the kernel internal GPIO numbers shouldn't be in the
> > sysfs API, instead userspace should use the names.
>
> This is true, but we cannot remove
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Actually I think the kernel internal GPIO numbers shouldn't be in the
> sysfs API, instead userspace should use the names.
This is true, but we cannot remove these numbers because they
are now in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net wrote:
Actually I think the kernel internal GPIO numbers shouldn't be in the
sysfs API, instead userspace should use the names.
This is true, but we cannot remove these numbers because they
are now in
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:00:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net wrote:
Actually I think the kernel internal GPIO numbers shouldn't be in the
sysfs API, instead userspace should use the names.
This is true, but we cannot
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:10:00PM +0800, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 8/6/2012 5:58 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:10:00PM +0800, Mitch Bradley wrote:
On 8/6/2012 5:58 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev
On 8/6/2012 5:58 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>
>>> I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev interface location, but I don't
>>> think it addresses Johannes' issue; finding out
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> > I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev interface location, but I don't
> > think it addresses Johannes' issue; finding out which GPIO IDs are
> > provided by which devices.
>
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev interface location, but I don't
> think it addresses Johannes' issue; finding out which GPIO IDs are
> provided by which devices.
>
> Perhaps in each device's sysfs node, there should be some information
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev interface location, but I don't
think it addresses Johannes' issue; finding out which GPIO IDs are
provided by which devices.
Perhaps in each device's sysfs node, there should be
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev interface location, but I don't
think it addresses Johannes' issue; finding out which GPIO IDs are
provided by
On 8/6/2012 5:58 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
I can't comment on the sysfs-vs-dev interface location, but I don't
think it addresses Johannes' issue;
On 08/05/2012 04:06 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>
>> I'm currently learning how Linux devicetree support works,
>> here is one question I couldn't find an answer for.
>>
>> I understand that within the devicetree GPIOs are referenced by
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> I'm currently learning how Linux devicetree support works,
> here is one question I couldn't find an answer for.
>
> I understand that within the devicetree GPIOs are referenced by phandle,
> thus the numbers are irrelevant. However,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net wrote:
I'm currently learning how Linux devicetree support works,
here is one question I couldn't find an answer for.
I understand that within the devicetree GPIOs are referenced by phandle,
thus the numbers are irrelevant.
On 08/05/2012 04:06 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net wrote:
I'm currently learning how Linux devicetree support works,
here is one question I couldn't find an answer for.
I understand that within the devicetree GPIOs are referenced
Hi,
I'm currently learning how Linux devicetree support works,
here is one question I couldn't find an answer for.
I understand that within the devicetree GPIOs are referenced by phandle,
thus the numbers are irrelevant. However, in sysfs the number is
what is used to access the GPIO, e.g. for
Hi,
I'm currently learning how Linux devicetree support works,
here is one question I couldn't find an answer for.
I understand that within the devicetree GPIOs are referenced by phandle,
thus the numbers are irrelevant. However, in sysfs the number is
what is used to access the GPIO, e.g. for
18 matches
Mail list logo
