On 08/20/2013 02:57 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/19, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 08/16/13 10:28, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2013
On 08/20/2013 02:57 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/19, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/16/13 10:28, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, S??ren
On 08/19, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 08/16/13 10:28, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
> > >>>
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/16/13 10:28, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> It's actually present. I have a clean 3.11-rc3 and
On 08/16/13 10:28, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> It's actually present. I have a clean 3.11-rc3 and the only changes are
>>> my patch to enable the GT and Stephen's fix.
>>> The cpuidle
On 08/16/13 10:28, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
It's actually present. I have a clean 3.11-rc3 and the only changes are
my patch to enable the GT and Stephen's fix.
The cpuidle stats show
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/16/13 10:28, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
It's actually present. I have a clean 3.11-rc3 and the only
On 08/19, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/16/13 10:28, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, S??ren Brinkmann wrote:
It's actually
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
On 08/12/2013 06:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/12/13 03:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/09/2013 07:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind
On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> yes, but at least the broadcast
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
> >>> wake
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:40:52AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/12/13 09:24, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On
On 08/12/13 09:24, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> yes, but at least the broadcast
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
> >>> wake
On 08/12/13 03:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 07:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
>>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
>>> never been tested
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
>>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
>>>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:08:46PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 06:03 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>>
> >>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0
On 08/12/2013 06:03 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
>>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
> > wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
> > never been tested before so the tick
On 08/09/2013 07:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
>> never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not
On 08/09/2013 07:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not handling this
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been tested before so the tick broadcast
On 08/12/2013 06:03 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:08:46PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:03 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been
On 08/12/13 03:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/09/2013 07:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been tested before so the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As
On 08/12/13 09:24, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:40:52AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:24, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As
On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should
On 08/12/2013 06:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 03:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/09/2013 07:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09,
On 08/12/2013 06:53 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 06:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:20:19AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/12/13 09:03, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at
On 08/09/13 10:48, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
>>> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
>>>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
> > wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
> > never been tested before so the tick
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
> wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
> never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not handling this
> case properly IMHO.
>
If you have a
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:32:42AM +0100, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> On 08/08/13 18:11, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM
On 08/09/2013 12:32 PM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> On 08/08/13 18:11, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:22:36PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/08/13 10:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören
On 08/08/13 18:11, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On 08/08/13 18:11, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:22:36PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/08/13 10:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On 08/09/2013 12:32 PM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
On 08/08/13 18:11, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:32:42AM +0100, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
On 08/08/13 18:11, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been tested before so the tick broadcast code is not handling this
case properly IMHO.
If you have a
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been tested before so the tick broadcast
On 08/09/13 10:48, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
yes, but at least the broadcast mechanism should send an IPI to cpu0 to
wake it up, no ? As Stephen stated this kind of configuration should has
never been
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:16:50PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013
On 08/08/13 10:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM,
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200,
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören
On 08/08/13 10:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:16:50PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 03:18 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > Soren: Are you able to replicate this issue on QEMU?
> > If yes, it should be the best if you can provide Qemu, kernel .config/
> > rootfs and simple manual
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:46:54AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 03:18 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > Soren: Are you able to replicate this issue on QEMU?
> > If yes, it should be the best if you can provide Qemu, kernel .config/
> > rootfs and simple manual
On 08/06/2013 03:18 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
[ ... ]
> Soren: Are you able to replicate this issue on QEMU?
> If yes, it should be the best if you can provide Qemu, kernel .config/
> rootfs and simple manual to Daniel how to reach that fault.
I tried to download qemu for
On 08/06/2013 03:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 02:41 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 08/06/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On 08/06/2013 02:41 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at
On 08/06/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On
On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu,
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On
On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at
On 08/06/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören
On 08/06/2013 02:41 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel
On 08/06/2013 03:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 02:41 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 11:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On
On 08/06/2013 03:18 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
[ ... ]
Soren: Are you able to replicate this issue on QEMU?
If yes, it should be the best if you can provide Qemu, kernel .config/
rootfs and simple manual to Daniel how to reach that fault.
I tried to download qemu for zynq but it fails:
git
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:18 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
[ ... ]
Soren: Are you able to replicate this issue on QEMU?
If yes, it should be the best if you can provide Qemu, kernel .config/
rootfs and simple manual to Daniel how to
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:46:54AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:28 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:18 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
[ ... ]
Soren: Are you able to replicate this issue on QEMU?
If yes, it should be the best if you can provide Qemu, kernel .config/
rootfs and simple manual to Daniel how to
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200,
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/31/2013 10:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed,
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/31/2013 10:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On
On 08/01/2013 07:43 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 01:38 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2013 10:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano
On 08/01/2013 12:18 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 10:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 10:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano
On 07/31/2013 10:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> (snip)
the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:34:48AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:27:25AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> (snip)
the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> (snip)
the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
(snip)
the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag tells the cpuidle
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
(snip)
the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag tells the cpuidle
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo