Hello,
in the last time I got several e-mails from you, but that must be a mistake
because I do not know you and I don´t know why you send me these e-mails.
Please check whether you have the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your
address-book. Please delete this address!! In past you have put this
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:23:57 Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:18:30 +0100,
> "J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Could the default target install names int the std kernel be changed to
> >System.map -> System.map-$(KERNELRELEASE)
> >vmlinuz->
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> Could the default target install names int the std kernel be changed to
> System.map -> System.map-$(KERNELRELEASE)
> vmlinuz-> vmlinuz-$(KERNELRELEASE)
> and then symlink to that ?
>
> I think everyone that has a stable2.2, a devel 2.2 and a
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:18:30 +0100,
"J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 02:58:37 Keith Owens wrote:
>> 2.5 kernel build wish list[1] has a couple of entries for standardising
>> the install targets. My thinking (and I know that some people disagree
>> with this)
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 02:58:37 Keith Owens wrote:
>
> 2.5 kernel build wish list[1] has a couple of entries for standardising
> the install targets. My thinking (and I know that some people disagree
> with this) is that the standard targets of a linux compile are only
>
> * vmlinux
> *
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 02:58:37 Keith Owens wrote:
2.5 kernel build wish list[1] has a couple of entries for standardising
the install targets. My thinking (and I know that some people disagree
with this) is that the standard targets of a linux compile are only
* vmlinux
* System.map
*
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:18:30 +0100,
"J . A . Magallon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 02:58:37 Keith Owens wrote:
2.5 kernel build wish list[1] has a couple of entries for standardising
the install targets. My thinking (and I know that some people disagree
with this) is that
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, J . A . Magallon wrote:
Could the default target install names int the std kernel be changed to
System.map - System.map-$(KERNELRELEASE)
vmlinuz- vmlinuz-$(KERNELRELEASE)
and then symlink to that ?
I think everyone that has a stable2.2, a devel 2.2 and a test24 is
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:23:57 Keith Owens wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:18:30 +0100,
"J . A . Magallon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could the default target install names int the std kernel be changed to
System.map - System.map-$(KERNELRELEASE)
vmlinuz- vmlinuz-$(KERNELRELEASE)
and then
Hello,
in the last time I got several e-mails from you, but that must be a mistake
because I do not know you and I don´t know why you send me these e-mails.
Please check whether you have the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your
address-book. Please delete this address!! In past you have put this
On 24 Nov 2000 16:40:50 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> [Matt D. Robinson]
>> > Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's
>> > disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ...
>> > I can
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Matt D. Robinson]
> > Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's
> > disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ...
> > I can make the changes for a few platforms.
>
> 2.5 material, already on the todo list.
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Matt D. Robinson]
Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's
disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ...
I can make the changes for a few platforms.
2.5 material, already on the todo list.
What is the
On 24 Nov 2000 16:40:50 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Matt D. Robinson]
Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's
disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ...
I can make the changes
[Matt D. Robinson]
> Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's
> disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ...
> I can make the changes for a few platforms.
2.5 material, already on the todo list.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
64738 wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I tried to find some information on whether the Linux Kernel Crash Dumps
> patches are going into 2.4 (or 2.5). Has there been any decision?
LKCD won't go into 2.4 (or 2.5) until I finish writing the direct
disk open/write functions that avoid going through the
Hi.
I tried to find some information on whether the Linux Kernel Crash Dumps
patches are going into 2.4 (or 2.5). Has there been any decision?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Hi.
I tried to find some information on whether the Linux Kernel Crash Dumps
patches are going into 2.4 (or 2.5). Has there been any decision?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
[Matt D. Robinson]
Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's
disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ...
I can make the changes for a few platforms.
2.5 material, already on the todo list.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
19 matches
Mail list logo
