Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 5 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you >> can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and >> mailing lists. >From bedf1cb3ddd162ee3b4c31cbb98d97431f70103d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 4 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you >> can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and >> mailing lists. >From e6a21b920fcca2f6f01c9528909dc036a9b3bc41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 3 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you >> can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and >> mailing lists. >From f4608fceec40b2b94aa9b4abe3bbb6d98ed5eed9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 2 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you >> can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and >> mailing lists. >From 1d2de3c3cfa43cc3c78a91200c41cef438b26a8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 1 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you >> can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and >> mailing lists. >From 48c9c4f61a7d7ea98538e02631a981a429281005 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 1 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and mailing lists. From 48c9c4f61a7d7ea98538e02631a981a429281005 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net Date:

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 2 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and mailing lists. From 1d2de3c3cfa43cc3c78a91200c41cef438b26a8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net Date:

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 3 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and mailing lists. From f4608fceec40b2b94aa9b4abe3bbb6d98ed5eed9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net Date:

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 4 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and mailing lists. From e6a21b920fcca2f6f01c9528909dc036a9b3bc41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net Date:

Re: [coccicheck Linux 3.14-rc5 PATCH 5 of 5] Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls

2014-03-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
If you are convinced that dropping the null tests is a good idea, then you can submit the patch that makes the change to the relevant maintainers and mailing lists. From bedf1cb3ddd162ee3b4c31cbb98d97431f70103d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net Date:

Linux 3.14-rc5

2014-03-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
four (1): powerpc/crashdump : Fix page frame number check in copy_oldmem_page Li Zefan (1): sysfs: fix namespace refcnt leak Linus Torvalds (1): Linux 3.14-rc5 Linus Walleij (1): dma: ste_dma40: don't dereference free:d descriptor Liu Ping Fan (1): powerpc/ftrace: bug

Linux 3.14-rc5

2014-03-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
/crashdump : Fix page frame number check in copy_oldmem_page Li Zefan (1): sysfs: fix namespace refcnt leak Linus Torvalds (1): Linux 3.14-rc5 Linus Walleij (1): dma: ste_dma40: don't dereference free:d descriptor Liu Ping Fan (1): powerpc/ftrace: bugfix for test_24bit_addr Manu