On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
wrote:
>
> [x86/mm/gup] e585513b76: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -6.9% regression
> Status: Asked on the list, but looks like issue gets ignored by everyone
> Note: I'm a bit unsure if adding this issue to this list was
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
wrote:
>
> [x86/mm/gup] e585513b76: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -6.9% regression
> Status: Asked on the list, but looks like issue gets ignored by everyone
> Note: I'm a bit unsure if adding this issue to this list was a good
> idea. Side note:
Hi! Find below my fifth regression report for Linux 4.13. It lists 4
regressions I'm currently aware of. There are no new ones; 2 got fixed
since the last report.
You can also find the report at http://bit.ly/lnxregrep413 where I try
to update it every now and then.
As always: Are you aware of
Hi! Find below my fifth regression report for Linux 4.13. It lists 4
regressions I'm currently aware of. There are no new ones; 2 got fixed
since the last report.
You can also find the report at http://bit.ly/lnxregrep413 where I try
to update it every now and then.
As always: Are you aware of
4 matches
Mail list logo