Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-27 Thread Minchan Kim
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:46:31PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: > On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: > >> On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >>> Hi alls, > >>> > >>> Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. >

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-27 Thread Minchan Kim
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:46:31PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact,

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-23 Thread Jerome Marchand
On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: >> On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> Hi alls, >>> >>> Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. >>> As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. >>> The reason

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-23 Thread Jerome Marchand
On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Minchan Kim
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: > On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi alls, > > > > Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. > > As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. > > The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Minchan Kim
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:08:43AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >Hi Nitin, > > > >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: > >>On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >>>Hi alls, > >>> > >>>Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Jerome Marchand
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi alls, > > Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. > As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. > The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL > in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :( > I can fix it via

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Nitin Gupta
On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi Nitin, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Nitin Gupta
On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi Nitin, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Jerome Marchand
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :( I can fix it via replacing

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Minchan Kim
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:08:43AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi Nitin, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact,

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-22 Thread Minchan Kim
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL in

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-21 Thread Nitin Gupta
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :( I can fix it via replacing

Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-21 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :( I can fix it via replacing GFP_KERNEL with GFP_NOIO. But more big problem is

Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-21 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :( I can fix it via replacing GFP_KERNEL with GFP_NOIO. But more big problem is

Re: Lockdep complain for zram

2012-11-21 Thread Nitin Gupta
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi alls, Today, I saw below complain of lockdep. As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that. The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :( I can fix it via replacing