On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:46:31PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> Hi alls,
> >>>
> >>> Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:46:31PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact,
On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>> On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> Hi alls,
>>>
>>> Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
>>> As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
>>> The reason
On 11/23/2012 12:34 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi alls,
> >
> > Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
> > As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
> > The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:08:43AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hi Nitin,
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> >>On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>>Hi alls,
> >>>
> >>>Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi alls,
>
> Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
> As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
> The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
> in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :(
> I can fix it via
On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep
On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :(
I can fix it via replacing
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:08:43AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 11/22/2012 12:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:13:24PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
On 11/21/2012 09:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
in
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :(
I can fix it via replacing
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :(
I can fix it via replacing GFP_KERNEL with GFP_NOIO.
But more big problem is
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :(
I can fix it via replacing GFP_KERNEL with GFP_NOIO.
But more big problem is
On 11/21/2012 12:37 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi alls,
Today, I saw below complain of lockdep.
As a matter of fact, I knew it long time ago but forgot that.
The reason lockdep complains is that now zram uses GFP_KERNEL
in reclaim path(ex, __zram_make_request) :(
I can fix it via replacing
16 matches
Mail list logo