Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:29:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > New year, new ping :-) If Sakari is not willing to do it himself, perhaps he may give me a tablet where something similar happened and I can try to find a time slot to look into it? > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:12:45AM +0300,

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

New year, new ping :-) On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:12:45AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Question for the Intel folks on this mail thread: how can we reach out > to the team responsible for this implementation, to figure out how they > meant the system to work ? > > I know Intel is a large

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Question for the Intel folks on this mail thread: how can we reach out to the team responsible for this implementation, to figure out how they meant the system to work ? I know Intel is a large company and the OTC is an entirely separate division from the one that created this "interesting" ACPI

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:26:55PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:35:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:10:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 01,

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Hi Andy, On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:35:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:10:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Mika, > > > > Reviving an old thread. > > Very old :-) > > > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Sun, May

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:10:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Mika, > > Reviving an old thread. Very old :-) > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:47:58AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > > > Mika Westerberg writes: > > > > On Fri,

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Hi Mika, Reviving an old thread. On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:47:58AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Mika Westerberg writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > > >> Ben Gamari writes: > > >> > > >>

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:47:58AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > Mika Westerberg writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > >> Ben Gamari writes: > >> > >> > [ Unknown signature status ] > >> > Mika

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:47:58AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > Mika Westerberg writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > >> Ben Gamari writes: > >> > >> > [ Unknown signature status ] > >> > Mika Westerberg writes: > >> > > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Mika Westerberg writes: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >> Ben Gamari writes: >> >> > [ Unknown signature status ] >> > Mika Westerberg writes: >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26,

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Mika Westerberg writes: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >> Ben Gamari writes: >> >> > [ Unknown signature status ] >> > Mika Westerberg writes: >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >> >>> >> > snip >> > >> >>> It looks very much

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > Ben Gamari writes: > > > [ Unknown signature status ] > > Mika Westerberg writes: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > >>> > > snip > > > >>>

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > Ben Gamari writes: > > > [ Unknown signature status ] > > Mika Westerberg writes: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > >>> > > snip > > > >>> It looks very much like these are describing the same

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Ben Gamari writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Mika Westerberg writes: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >>> > snip > >>> It looks very much like these are describing the same device. Perhaps >>> the

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Ben Gamari writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Mika Westerberg writes: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >>> > snip > >>> It looks very much like these are describing the same device. Perhaps >>> the lpss driver should be binding to this ACPI node? Or

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Mika Westerberg writes: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >> snip >> It looks very much like these are describing the same device. Perhaps >> the lpss driver should be binding to this ACPI node? Or perhaps this is >> a firmware

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

Mika Westerberg writes: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: >> snip >> It looks very much like these are describing the same device. Perhaps >> the lpss driver should be binding to this ACPI node? Or perhaps this is >> a firmware issue? Any guidance would be greatly

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > > While trying to troubleshoot some touchpad issues on a Dell Latitude > E7470 (namely the touchpad being exposed only as a PS/2 device) I > noticed that the intel-lpss driver (using a 4.6-rc4 kernel) fails to > load with, > >

Re: OpRegion conflicts for Skylake LPSS

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:13AM +0200, Ben Gamari wrote: > > While trying to troubleshoot some touchpad issues on a Dell Latitude > E7470 (namely the touchpad being exposed only as a PS/2 device) I > noticed that the intel-lpss driver (using a 4.6-rc4 kernel) fails to > load with, > >