On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:45:43AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Any update on this, Ivan? Maybe I missed your post, but I haven't seen
> anything yet...
No, I didn't post anything, sorry. This turned out to be not as trivial
as I thought - I've played with that code on amd64, and results were
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:45:43AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Any update on this, Ivan? Maybe I missed your post, but I haven't seen
anything yet...
No, I didn't post anything, sorry. This turned out to be not as trivial
as I thought - I've played with that code on amd64, and results were
On Friday, April 20, 2007 1:30 pm Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:28:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Actually, I would suggest we not do it automatically (because the
> > need for it is just so low, and the downsides are potentially huge
> > - there are just too many
On Friday, April 20, 2007 1:30 pm Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:28:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, I would suggest we not do it automatically (because the
need for it is just so low, and the downsides are potentially huge
- there are just too many resources
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2007 11:28 am Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Sounds good, hopefully reassigning the bridge resources won't cause
too much trouble. Do you have time to hack this up? If not, I
could give it a try, as long as ajax is
On Friday, April 20, 2007 11:28 am Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Sounds good, hopefully reassigning the bridge resources won't cause
> > too much trouble. Do you have time to hack this up? If not, I
> > could give it a try, as long as ajax is willing to
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:28:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Actually, I would suggest we not do it automatically (because the need for
> it is just so low, and the downsides are potentially huge - there are just
> too many resources that are "hidden" from us through ACPI tricks and
>
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> Sounds good, hopefully reassigning the bridge resources won't cause too
> much trouble. Do you have time to hack this up? If not, I could give
> it a try, as long as ajax is willing to test...
Actually, I would suggest we not do it automatically
On Friday, April 20, 2007 2:23 am Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:19:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I think we used to *never* assign PCI bus resources on x86, but
> > that thing got fixed some time ago. Now I think we only re-assign
> > them if they were unassigned *or*
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:19:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think we used to *never* assign PCI bus resources on x86, but that thing
> got fixed some time ago. Now I think we only re-assign them if they were
> unassigned *or* if the assignment wasn't working before. But I'm not 100%
>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:19:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I think we used to *never* assign PCI bus resources on x86, but that thing
got fixed some time ago. Now I think we only re-assign them if they were
unassigned *or* if the assignment wasn't working before. But I'm not 100%
sure
On Friday, April 20, 2007 2:23 am Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:19:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I think we used to *never* assign PCI bus resources on x86, but
that thing got fixed some time ago. Now I think we only re-assign
them if they were unassigned *or* if the
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Sounds good, hopefully reassigning the bridge resources won't cause too
much trouble. Do you have time to hack this up? If not, I could give
it a try, as long as ajax is willing to test...
Actually, I would suggest we not do it automatically
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:28:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, I would suggest we not do it automatically (because the need for
it is just so low, and the downsides are potentially huge - there are just
too many resources that are hidden from us through ACPI tricks and
having
On Friday, April 20, 2007 11:28 am Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Sounds good, hopefully reassigning the bridge resources won't cause
too much trouble. Do you have time to hack this up? If not, I
could give it a try, as long as ajax is willing to test...
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2007 11:28 am Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Sounds good, hopefully reassigning the bridge resources won't cause
too much trouble. Do you have time to hack this up? If not, I
could give it a try, as long as ajax is
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:11:50PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 5, 2007 3:37 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > So I'm attempting to do something fairly heinous (X server across
> > > five video cards), and I hit a fun bug in bridge range
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:11:50PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, April 5, 2007 3:37 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
> > So I'm attempting to do something fairly heinous (X server across
> > five video cards), and I hit a fun bug in bridge range setup. See
> > attached lspci and dmesg, but the
On Thursday, April 5, 2007 3:37 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
> So I'm attempting to do something fairly heinous (X server across
> five video cards), and I hit a fun bug in bridge range setup. See
> attached lspci and dmesg, but the short of it is I've got two VGA
> chips on one card behind a bridge,
On Thursday, April 5, 2007 3:37 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
So I'm attempting to do something fairly heinous (X server across
five video cards), and I hit a fun bug in bridge range setup. See
attached lspci and dmesg, but the short of it is I've got two VGA
chips on one card behind a bridge, which
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:11:50PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thursday, April 5, 2007 3:37 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
So I'm attempting to do something fairly heinous (X server across
five video cards), and I hit a fun bug in bridge range setup. See
attached lspci and dmesg, but the short
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:11:50PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thursday, April 5, 2007 3:37 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
So I'm attempting to do something fairly heinous (X server across
five video cards), and I hit a fun bug in bridge range setup. See
22 matches
Mail list logo
