On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 08.03.2013 03:15, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Wouldn't this just be set up by the DT in the same way that other
> > off-SoC hardware is?
> Well, I thought so too. To repeat, in my DT, I have:
OK, I got CCed in part way through the
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 08.03.2013 03:15, Mark Brown wrote:
Wouldn't this just be set up by the DT in the same way that other
off-SoC hardware is?
Well, I thought so too. To repeat, in my DT, I have:
OK, I got CCed in part way through the thread.
On 03/08/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 08.03.2013 03:15, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
Grep'ing through arch/arm, it seems that the imx arch does the same
thing my patch does, but I could also
On 03/08/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 08.03.2013 03:15, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
Grep'ing through arch/arm, it seems that the imx arch does the same
thing my patch does, but I could also
On 08.03.2013 03:15, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
>
>>> I feel that for a platform having it's clock tree in DT, of_clk_init
>>> would take care of it, but if clock tree data is not in DT, clock
>>>
On 08.03.2013 03:15, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
I feel that for a platform having it's clock tree in DT, of_clk_init
would take care of it, but if clock tree data is not in DT, clock
tree would
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> > I feel that for a platform having it's clock tree in DT, of_clk_init
> > would take care of it, but if clock tree data is not in DT, clock
> > tree would have to be extended in a non-DT
Hi Afzal,
thanks for looking into this.
On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:31AM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
>
>> Hope invoking of_clk_init before clock generator driver helps
>
> Mails coming from this id are in my personal capacity.
>
> On Tue, Feb
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:31AM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Hope invoking of_clk_init before clock generator driver helps
Mails coming from this id are in my personal capacity.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
I feel that for a platform having it's clock tree in DT, of_clk_init
would take care of it, but if clock tree data is not in DT, clock
tree would have to be extended in a non-DT way.
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:31AM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
Hope invoking of_clk_init before clock generator driver helps
Mails coming from this id are in my personal capacity.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam
Hi Afzal,
thanks for looking into this.
On 07.03.2013 19:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:31AM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
Hope invoking of_clk_init before clock generator driver helps
Mails coming from this id are in my personal capacity.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013
Hi eyerone,
On 19.02.2013 18:32, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 19.02.2013 18:22, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> > Quoting Daniel Mack (2013-02-19 01:53:18)
>>> >> Hi Fabio,
>>> >> Hi Afzal,
>>> >>
>>> >> On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hi eyerone,
On 19.02.2013 18:32, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 19.02.2013 18:22, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Daniel Mack (2013-02-19 01:53:18)
Hi Fabio,
Hi Afzal,
On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This
On 19.02.2013 18:22, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Mack (2013-02-19 01:53:18)
>> Hi Fabio,
>> Hi Afzal,
>>
>> On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here.
Hi Fabio,
Hi Afzal,
On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
>> driver with the following DTS sub-node:
>>
>> ref25: ref25M {
>>
Hi Fabio,
Hi Afzal,
On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
driver with the following DTS sub-node:
ref25: ref25M {
On 19.02.2013 18:22, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Daniel Mack (2013-02-19 01:53:18)
Hi Fabio,
Hi Afzal,
On 19.02.2013 02:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:55:52AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> ref25: ref25M {
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> clock-frequency = <2500>;
> };
>
> clock-generator@0 {
>
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
> driver with the following DTS sub-node:
>
> ref25: ref25M {
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> #clock-cells =
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
> driver with the following DTS sub-node:
>
> ref25: ref25M {
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> #clock-cells = <0>;
>
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
driver with the following DTS sub-node:
ref25: ref25M {
compatible = "fixed-clock";
#clock-cells = <0>;
clock-frequency = <2500>;
};
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
driver with the following DTS sub-node:
ref25: ref25M {
compatible = fixed-clock;
#clock-cells = 0;
clock-frequency = 2500;
};
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
driver with the following DTS sub-node:
ref25: ref25M {
compatible = fixed-clock;
#clock-cells = 0;
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This might be a stupid question, but I'm somehow stuck here. I'm using a
driver with the following DTS sub-node:
ref25: ref25M {
compatible = fixed-clock;
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:55:52AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
ref25: ref25M {
compatible = fixed-clock;
#clock-cells = 0;
clock-frequency = 2500;
};
clock-generator@0 {
/* ... */
26 matches
Mail list logo