> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:24 PM
> To: Koenig, Christian
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeon: Do not
From: Christian König
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:38:32 +0100
> On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Christian König
>> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
>>
>>> In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
>>> bit questionable to do so.
>>>
>>> For radeon
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> From: Christian König
>> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
>>
>>> In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
>>> bit questionable to do so.
>>>
>>> For radeon
On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote:
From: Christian König
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
bit questionable to do so.
For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs
should work even without
On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote:
From: Christian König christian.koe...@amd.com
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
bit questionable to do so.
For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Christian König
christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote:
From: Christian König christian.koe...@amd.com
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
bit questionable
From: Christian König christian.koe...@amd.com
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:38:32 +0100
On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote:
From: Christian König christian.koe...@amd.com
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
bit
-Original Message-
From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:24 PM
To: Koenig, Christian
Cc: Deucher, Alexander; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeon: Do not directly dereference pointers
From: Christian König
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
> In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
> bit questionable to do so.
>
> For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs
> should work even without using the specialized IO
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a bit
questionable to do so.
For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs
should work even without using the specialized IO macros/functions,
otherwise mapping VRAM CPU accessible isn't really possible.
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a bit
questionable to do so.
For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs
should work even without using the specialized IO macros/functions,
otherwise mapping VRAM CPU accessible isn't really possible.
From: Christian König christian.koe...@amd.com
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100
In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a
bit questionable to do so.
For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs
should work even without using the
12 matches
Mail list logo
