> m...@lists.infradead.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas
> > <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>; Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-
> > electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagn...@jcrosoft.com>;
> > Russell King <li...@arm.lin
gt; > ; Ian Campbell ; Kumar
> > Gala ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > m...@lists.infradead.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas
> > ; Alexandre Belloni > electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard ;
> > Russell King ; Josh Wu ;
> &g
; Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-
> electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagn...@jcrosoft.com>;
> Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>; Josh Wu <rainyfeel...@outlook.com>;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/
ists.infradead.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas
> ; Alexandre Belloni electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard ;
> Russell King ; Josh Wu ;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4-
>
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:51:17PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> It is a datasheet bug, for current SoCs, the RB_EDGE3(i.e. bit 27)
> of HSMC_SR register does not exist, the RB_EDGE0 (i.e. bit 24) is
> the ready/busy line edge status bit. So the compatible
> "atmel,sama5d4-nfc" is unneeded.
The
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:51:17PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> It is a datasheet bug, for current SoCs, the RB_EDGE3(i.e. bit 27)
> of HSMC_SR register does not exist, the RB_EDGE0 (i.e. bit 24) is
> the ready/busy line edge status bit. So the compatible
> "atmel,sama5d4-nfc" is unneeded.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
