On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:27:04 -0700 "Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I realize this e-mail might be nuisance and time waster for you but I'm
> in need of advice. I apologize in advance for any commonsense cultural
> conventions I'm breaking.
>
> I sent the below patch to
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:11:59 +0530 Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:40 AM
> > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: Medve
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:40 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
... no maintainer explicitly copied on the original
Hello Andrew,
I realize this e-mail might be nuisance and time waster for you but I'm
in need of advice. I apologize in advance for any commonsense cultural
conventions I'm breaking.
I sent the below patch to four e-mail lists and it lead to orthogonal
conversations about how the entire kernel
Hello Andrew,
I realize this e-mail might be nuisance and time waster for you but I'm
in need of advice. I apologize in advance for any commonsense cultural
conventions I'm breaking.
I sent the below patch to four e-mail lists and it lead to orthogonal
conversations about how the entire kernel
-Original Message-
From: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:40 AM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
... no maintainer explicitly copied on the original mail who'd push
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:11:59 +0530 Satyam Sharma wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:40 AM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:27:04 -0700 Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I realize this e-mail might be nuisance and time waster for you but I'm
in need of advice. I apologize in advance for any commonsense cultural
conventions I'm breaking.
I sent the below patch to four e-mail
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 11:44 -0700, Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote:
> First, this patch doesn't have the trailing "\n" problem that one had.
I expect all the kernel logging functions to be
overhauled eventually.
I'd prefer a mechanism that somehow supports
identifying complete messages. I think
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Engelhardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:04 PM
> To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family
On Sep 12 2007 11:39, Emil Medve wrote:
>
>Other/Some pr_*() macros are already defined in kernel.h, but pr_err() was
>defined
>multiple times in several other places
Note http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/4/30 .
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Sep 12 2007 11:39, Emil Medve wrote:
Other/Some pr_*() macros are already defined in kernel.h, but pr_err() was
defined
multiple times in several other places
Note http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/4/30 .
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
-Original Message-
From: Jan Engelhardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:04 PM
To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family of
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 11:44 -0700, Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote:
First, this patch doesn't have the trailing \n problem that one had.
I expect all the kernel logging functions to be
overhauled eventually.
I'd prefer a mechanism that somehow supports
identifying complete messages. I think the
14 matches
Mail list logo
