Divy Le Ray wrote:
So, it sounds like Krishna's patch is ok, because the race does not
exist anymore in this driver?
The first part is right indeed, but the second part is breaking the
current usage of txq_stopped and
the logic that stops and restarts the Tx queue.
I can submit a patch
So, it sounds like Krishna's patch is ok, because the race does not
exist anymore in this driver?
The first part is right indeed, but the second part is breaking the
current usage of txq_stopped and
the logic that stops and restarts the Tx queue.
I can submit a patch fixing it. Plese let me
Marin Mitov wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 12:59:04 am you wrote:
Divy Le Ray wrote:
From: "Divy Le Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 12:59:04 am you wrote:
> Divy Le Ray wrote:
> >> From: "Divy Le Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
> >>
> >>> The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
> >>
> >> That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
> >> use a model
Divy Le Ray wrote:
From: "Divy Le Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and others use. LLTX is a lost cause
for hardware device drivers, and in
Divy Le Ray wrote:
From: Divy Le Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and others use. LLTX is a lost cause
for hardware device drivers, and in fact
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 12:59:04 am you wrote:
Divy Le Ray wrote:
From: Divy Le Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and others use.
Marin Mitov wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 12:59:04 am you wrote:
Divy Le Ray wrote:
From: Divy Le Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and
So, it sounds like Krishna's patch is ok, because the race does not
exist anymore in this driver?
The first part is right indeed, but the second part is breaking the
current usage of txq_stopped and
the logic that stops and restarts the Tx queue.
I can submit a patch fixing it. Plese let me
Divy Le Ray wrote:
So, it sounds like Krishna's patch is ok, because the race does not
exist anymore in this driver?
The first part is right indeed, but the second part is breaking the
current usage of txq_stopped and
the logic that stops and restarts the Tx queue.
I can submit a patch
> From: "Divy Le Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
>
> > The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
>
> That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
> use a model like tg3 and others use. LLTX is a lost cause
> for hardware device drivers, and in fact
From: "Divy Le Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
> The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and others use. LLTX is a lost cause
for hardware device drivers, and in fact we'd like to
Hi Divy,
But the race doesn't exist even for LLTX drivers these days. There is no
way two cpu's can execute the xmit handler at the same time.
Thanks,
- KK
> > > > The first part of the patch removes the !netif_queue_stopped(dev).
> > > > It opens the race discussed a while ago between Stephen
> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Divy Le Ray; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [git patches] net dri
From: Krishna Kumar2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:49 +0530
> Hi Divy,
>
> > > Explain why, so I can include it in the changelog please...
> >
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > The first part of the patch removes the !netif_queue_stopped(dev).
> > It opens the race discussed a while ago
Hi Divy,
> > Explain why, so I can include it in the changelog please...
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> The first part of the patch removes the !netif_queue_stopped(dev).
> It opens the race discussed a while ago between Stephen hemminger and
> David Miller:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=113383224512427=2
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Divy Le Ray wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
Divy Le Ray wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
Divy Le Ray wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Divy Le Ray wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
Hi Divy,
Explain why, so I can include it in the changelog please...
Hi Jeff,
The first part of the patch removes the !netif_queue_stopped(dev).
It opens the race discussed a while ago between Stephen hemminger and
David Miller:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=113383224512427w=2
I
From: Krishna Kumar2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:49 +0530
Hi Divy,
Explain why, so I can include it in the changelog please...
Hi Jeff,
The first part of the patch removes the !netif_queue_stopped(dev).
It opens the race discussed a while ago between Stephen
-Original Message-
From: David Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Divy Le Ray; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [git patches] net driver updates
From: Krishna
Hi Divy,
But the race doesn't exist even for LLTX drivers these days. There is no
way two cpu's can execute the xmit handler at the same time.
Thanks,
- KK
The first part of the patch removes the !netif_queue_stopped(dev).
It opens the race discussed a while ago between Stephen
From: Divy Le Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and others use. LLTX is a lost cause
for hardware device drivers, and in fact we'd like to remove
From: Divy Le Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:08 -0800
The driver is cxgb3 here, it uses LLTX.
That's extremely unfortunate, hopefully you can update it to
use a model like tg3 and others use. LLTX is a lost cause
for hardware device drivers, and in fact we'd like to
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:05:16 -0500
> Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
> exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
> acked for a while, just not committed.
>
> Please pull from 'upstream-davem'
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:05:16 -0500
Mostly fixes, a few cleanups (generally assisting fixes), and an
exception for PS3 wireless because it had been posted, reviewed and
acked for a while, just not committed.
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:49:50 -0500
> Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
> upstream-davem
>
> to receive the following updates:
Pulled, thanks Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:49:50 -0500
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-davem
to receive the following updates:
Pulled, thanks Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi,
Can somebody point me where could I get the MMU(Memory management Unit) details
?
Regards,
Pravin
-**Nihilent***
" *** All information contained in this communication is confidential,
proprietary, privileged
and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave
Hi,
Can somebody point me where could I get the MMU(Memory management Unit) details
?
Regards,
Pravin
-**Nihilent***
*** All information contained in this communication is confidential,
proprietary, privileged
and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:52:10 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:38 -0500
>
> > Please pull from 'upstream2-davem' branch of
>
> This is now pulled and pushed back out to net-2.6
The first S2io patch breaks
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:52:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:38 -0500
Please pull from 'upstream2-davem' branch of
This is now pulled and pushed back out to net-2.6
The first S2io patch breaks the build
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:38 -0500
> Please pull from 'upstream2-davem' branch of
This is now pulled and pushed back out to net-2.6
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:38 -0500
> This submit is based on top of Linus's tree, since I'm not sure what's
> going on with net-2.6.git and my previous (lost?) submission.
>
> These changes do /not/ include anything from the previous submission,
> which
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:38 -0500
This submit is based on top of Linus's tree, since I'm not sure what's
going on with net-2.6.git and my previous (lost?) submission.
These changes do /not/ include anything from the previous submission,
which was on
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:38 -0500
Please pull from 'upstream2-davem' branch of
This is now pulled and pushed back out to net-2.6
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:17:21 -0500
>
> Please pull from the 'upstream' branch of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream
>
> to receive my 2.6.25 net driver queue into davem/net-2.6.25.git:
Pulled and pushed back
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:17:21 -0500
Please pull from the 'upstream' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream
to receive my 2.6.25 net driver queue into davem/net-2.6.25.git:
Pulled and pushed back out,
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:03:26 -0400
>
> Please pull from the 'upstream-davem' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
> upstream-davem
>
> to receive these changes:
Pulled and pushed back out, thanks Jeff!
-
To
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:03:26 -0400
Please pull from the 'upstream-davem' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-davem
to receive these changes:
Pulled and pushed back out, thanks Jeff!
-
To unsubscribe
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:20:08 -0400
> Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
> upstream-davem
>
Pulled, and pushed back out to net-2.6.24, thanks Jeff.
-
To unsubscribe from this
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:20:08 -0400
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-davem
Pulled, and pushed back out to net-2.6.24, thanks Jeff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:39:16 -0400
>
> Normally I wait a day or two between pushes, to queue up patches and
> also to avoid annoying my upstream :) But this includes a couple fixes
> I felt should be upstreamed sooner rather than later.
>
> Please pull
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:39:16 -0400
Normally I wait a day or two between pushes, to queue up patches and
also to avoid annoying my upstream :) But this includes a couple fixes
I felt should be upstreamed sooner rather than later.
Please pull from
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:41:50 -0400
> Please pull from the 'upstream' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream
Pulled and pushed back out to net-2.6.24, thanks Jeff!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:41:50 -0400
Please pull from the 'upstream' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream
Pulled and pushed back out to net-2.6.24, thanks Jeff!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:26:10 -0400
> Please pull from the 'upstream' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream
>
> to receive the following changes:
Pulled into net-2.6.24 and pushed out, thanks Jeff!
-
To
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:26:10 -0400
Please pull from the 'upstream' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream
to receive the following changes:
Pulled into net-2.6.24 and pushed out, thanks Jeff!
-
To
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Various minor updates. The only thing of note is sk98lin driver
removal. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
This is
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Various minor updates. The only thing of note is sk98lin driver removal.
> Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
> upstream-linus
This is probably going to cause a new entry in
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Various minor updates. The only thing of note is sk98lin driver removal.
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
This is probably going to cause a new entry in
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Various minor updates. The only thing of note is sk98lin driver
removal. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
This is
On Friday 18 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:46:21 +0200
>
>Mariusz Koz__owski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
>> > index 7053026..111f23d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
>> > +++
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> > > index 7053026..111f23d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> > > @@ -279,6 +279,40 @@ SMC_outw(u16 val, void __iomem *ioaddr, int reg)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +#define SMC_outb(v, a, r) __ __
On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:46:21 +0200
Mariusz Koz__owski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> > index 7053026..111f23d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> > @@ -279,6 +279,40 @@ SMC_outw(u16 val,
Hello,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> index 7053026..111f23d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
> @@ -279,6 +279,40 @@ SMC_outw(u16 val, void __iomem *ioaddr, int reg)
...
> +#define SMC_outb(v, a, r)
Hello,
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
index 7053026..111f23d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
@@ -279,6 +279,40 @@ SMC_outw(u16 val, void __iomem *ioaddr, int reg)
...
+#define SMC_outb(v, a, r)
On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:46:21 +0200
Mariusz Koz__owski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
index 7053026..111f23d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
@@ -279,6 +279,40 @@ SMC_outw(u16 val, void __iomem
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
index 7053026..111f23d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
@@ -279,6 +279,40 @@ SMC_outw(u16 val, void __iomem *ioaddr, int reg)
...
+#define SMC_outb(v, a, r) __ __
On Friday 18 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:46:21 +0200
Mariusz Koz__owski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.h b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
index 7053026..111f23d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.h
@@ -279,6
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:19:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> (just sent this upstream to Linus and Andrew)
>
> The only really notable thing is the merging of the wireless driver for
> the OLPC, libertas.
I don't think it's quite ready yet, at least I've got no feedback about
completion of
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:19:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
(just sent this upstream to Linus and Andrew)
The only really notable thing is the merging of the wireless driver for
the OLPC, libertas.
I don't think it's quite ready yet, at least I've got no feedback about
completion of the
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.c
mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.h
Did you mean to have these? Commit bd36b0ac appears to have
brought the mode bits change in.
Not trying to nitpick --- I am
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mode change 100644 = 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.c
mode change 100644 = 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.h
Did you mean to have these? Commit bd36b0ac appears to have
brought the mode bits change in.
Not trying to nitpick --- I am
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.c
> mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.h
Did you mean to have these? Commit bd36b0ac appears to have
brought the mode bits change in.
Not trying to nitpick --- I am trying to find out if
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mode change 100644 = 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.c
mode change 100644 = 100755 drivers/net/qla3xxx.h
Did you mean to have these? Commit bd36b0ac appears to have
brought the mode bits change in.
Not trying to nitpick --- I am trying to find out if this
70 matches
Mail list logo
