On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:11:42PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "Manuel A. McLure" wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik said...
> > > Changing '#undef DEBUG' to '#define DEBUG 1' in
> > > arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h is also very helpful. Can you guys do so,
> > > and post the 'dmesg -s 16384' results to lkml?
Le 10-Apr-2001, Manuel A. McLure écrivait :
> This may be the difference - I always set "Plug-n-Play OS: No" on all my
> machines. Linux works fine and it doesn't seem to hurt Windows 98 any.
I've been told it affects the way IRQs are assigned; With "PnP OS: No", some
boards (seen on several Asu
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote:
> I'd do that if this wasn't also my Windows 98 gaming machine - I'm supposing
> that the Windows drivers do use the IRQ even if XFree86/Linux doesn't. I
> dunno if Windows is smart enough to assign an IRQ even if the BIOS doesn't.
> Anyway, things are working now (specia
> > I do have an IRQ for my VGA since the instructions for my
> card (a Voodoo 5
> > 5500) specifically say an IRQ is needed.
>
> I wonder though... In my mind this is a driver not hardware issue. If
> the XFree86 and/or Linux console driver do not use the IRQ,
> you need not
> have BIOS assi
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote:
> Jeff Garzik said...
> > Changing '#undef DEBUG' to '#define DEBUG 1' in
> > arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h is also very helpful. Can you guys do so,
> > and post the 'dmesg -s 16384' results to lkml? This includes the same
> > information as dump_pirq, as well as some ad
Jeff Garzik said...
> Changing '#undef DEBUG' to '#define DEBUG 1' in
> arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h is also very helpful. Can you guys do so,
> and post the 'dmesg -s 16384' results to lkml? This includes the same
> information as dump_pirq, as well as some additional information.
Here's my dme
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:38:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > 0.7.[2,3] are the usb devices. BIOS (and 2.2 kernels) had them at IRQ 5.
> > 2.4 somehow picks the irq of the ethernet adapter, iqr 11, instead.
> > At least usb is then unusable.
> > As you say that you have the
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote:
> This may be the difference - I always set "Plug-n-Play OS: No" on all my
> machines. Linux works fine and it doesn't seem to hurt Windows 98 any.
Correct, it's perfectly fine to do that on all machines (not just Via).
Users should also set "PNP OS: N
Axel Thimm said...
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:51:18AM -0700, Manuel A. McLure wrote:
> > I have the same motherboard with the same lspci output
> (i.e. I get the "pin
> > ?" part), but I don't see any problems running 2.4.3 or
> 2.4.3-ac[23]. I am
> > only using a trackball on my USB port - wh
Axel Thimm wrote:
> 0.7.[2,3] are the usb devices. BIOS (and 2.2 kernels) had them at IRQ 5. 2.4
> somehow picks the irq of the ethernet adapter, iqr 11, instead.
>
> At least usb is then unusable.
>
> As you say that you have the same board, what is the output of dump_pirq - are
> your link val
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:51:18AM -0700, Manuel A. McLure wrote:
> Axel Thimm said...
> > Several weeks ago there had been a thread on the pirq assignments of newer
> > VIA and SiS chipsets ending with everybody happy.
> > Everybody? Not everybody - there is a small village of chipsets resisting
Axel Thimm said...
> Several weeks ago there had been a thread on the pirq
> assignments of newer VIA
> and SiS chipsets ending with everybody happy.
>
> Everybody? Not everybody - there is a small village of
> chipsets resisting the
> advent of 2.4.x :(
>
> The system is a KT133A (MSI's K7T T
12 matches
Mail list logo
