On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:10:02PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:15:22PM +, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> > Odd. Nothing related to these variables has changed in years.
>
> Odd indeed. Building that same config on two other boxes doesn't trip
> those up so it must
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:10:02PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:15:22PM +, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> > Odd. Nothing related to these variables has changed in years.
>
> Odd indeed. Building that same config on two other boxes doesn't trip
> those up so it must
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:15:22PM +, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> Odd. Nothing related to these variables has changed in years.
Odd indeed. Building that same config on two other boxes doesn't trip
those up so it must be something gcc-related on that particular box.
Hmmm.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 3:56 AM
> To: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: radeon -Wmaybe-uninitialized crap
>
> Hi guys,
>
> this just started appearing when building -rc4. Got fixes
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 3:56 AM
> To: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: radeon -Wmaybe-uninitialized crap
>
> Hi guys,
>
> this just started appearing when building -rc4. Got fixes
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:15:22PM +, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> Odd. Nothing related to these variables has changed in years.
Odd indeed. Building that same config on two other boxes doesn't trip
those up so it must be something gcc-related on that particular box.
Hmmm.
--
6 matches
Mail list logo
