On 9/12/2013 12:45 AM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 12:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> (9/3/13 4:39 AM), Janani Venkataraman wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a
>>> specific
>>> process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can
On 9/12/2013 12:45 AM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
On 09/12/2013 12:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
(9/3/13 4:39 AM), Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a
specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to
On 09/12/2013 12:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (9/3/13 4:39 AM), Janani Venkataraman wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a
>> specific
>> process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a
>> case where
>> a process is able
(9/3/13 4:39 AM), Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a case where
a process is able to take a self-core dump.
gcore, an existing utility creates a
(9/3/13 4:39 AM), Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a case where
a process is able to take a self-core dump.
gcore, an existing utility creates a
On 09/12/2013 12:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
(9/3/13 4:39 AM), Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a
specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a
case where
a process is able to take a
On 09/04/2013 05:03 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/04/2013 02:53 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
On 09/03/2013 04:24 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 02:47 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
On 09/03/2013 04:01 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:39 PM, Janani Venkataraman
On 09/04/2013 05:03 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/04/2013 02:53 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
On 09/03/2013 04:24 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 02:47 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
On 09/03/2013 04:01 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:39 PM, Janani Venkataraman
> Briefly -- we will implement the CRIU service, which is a daemon running from
> root and listening on a unix socket. When a task wants to dump himself, it
> sends
> to the service a "dump me" message. The service then goes and dumps the
> process.
Maybe I'm missing something, but if the dump
On 09/03/2013 04:24 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 02:47 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
On 09/03/2013 04:01 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:39 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at
On 09/03/2013 04:24 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 02:47 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
On 09/03/2013 04:01 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:39 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at
Briefly -- we will implement the CRIU service, which is a daemon running from
root and listening on a unix socket. When a task wants to dump himself, it
sends
to the service a dump me message. The service then goes and dumps the
process.
Maybe I'm missing something, but if the dump file
On 09/03/2013 04:01 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:39 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a case where
a process is able to take a
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a case where
a process is able to take a self-core dump.
gcore, an existing utility creates a core image of the specified process. It
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a case where
a process is able to take a self-core dump.
gcore, an existing utility creates a core image of the specified process. It
On 09/03/2013 04:01 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 09/03/2013 12:39 PM, Janani Venkataraman wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an infrastructure to create a system core file of a specific
process at run-time, non-disruptively. It can also be extended to a case where
a process is able to take a
16 matches
Mail list logo
