Grandios! http://knrsbwy.Merissa836.xyz/index
___
Bis bald
nik_bin_nek_a...@yahoo.com
>> I have just started to contribute to linux kernel. I was thinking of
>> giving a patch where a variable is made null after free if not already
>> done.
>>
> General answer is no... unless that particular code expects a freed pointer
> to be null. In many cases the code is written so that this
>> I have just started to contribute to linux kernel. I was thinking of
>> giving a patch where a variable is made null after free if not already
>> done.
>>
> General answer is no... unless that particular code expects a freed pointer
> to be null. In many cases the code is written so that this
On 01/17/18 02:44, Jose Bale wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have just started to contribute to linux kernel. I was thinking of
> giving a patch where a variable is made null after free if not already
> done.
>
> Some thing like this:
> Original code:
> kfree(x);
> ...some other
On 01/17/18 02:44, Jose Bale wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have just started to contribute to linux kernel. I was thinking of
> giving a patch where a variable is made null after free if not already
> done.
>
> Some thing like this:
> Original code:
> kfree(x);
> ...some other
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pan, Jacob jun
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 5:19 AM
> To: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: Chen, Yu C; 'Len Brown'; Jacob Pan; H. Peter Anvin; Peter Zijlstra;
> x...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pan, Jacob jun
> Subject: Re: Hi, Ingo,
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pan, Jacob jun
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 5:19 AM
> To: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: Chen, Yu C; 'Len Brown'; Jacob Pan; H. Peter Anvin; Peter Zijlstra;
> x...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pan, Jacob jun
> Subject: Re: Hi, Ingo,
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:31:04 +0200
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:59:19 -0700
> > "Chen, Yu C" wrote:
> >
> > > Currently it is in your x86/timer tree:
> > >
> > > commit
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:31:04 +0200
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:59:19 -0700
> > "Chen, Yu C" wrote:
> >
> > > Currently it is in your x86/timer tree:
> > >
> > > commit fc273eeef314cdaf0ac992b400d126f8184a4d1c
> > > Author: Len Brown
> > > Date:
* Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:59:19 -0700
> "Chen, Yu C" wrote:
>
> > Currently it is in your x86/timer tree:
> >
> > commit fc273eeef314cdaf0ac992b400d126f8184a4d1c
> > Author: Len Brown
> > Date: Fri Jun 17
* Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:59:19 -0700
> "Chen, Yu C" wrote:
>
> > Currently it is in your x86/timer tree:
> >
> > commit fc273eeef314cdaf0ac992b400d126f8184a4d1c
> > Author: Len Brown
> > Date: Fri Jun 17 01:22:49 2016 -0400
> >
> > x86/tsc_msr: Extend to include
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:59:19 -0700
"Chen, Yu C" wrote:
> Currently it is in your x86/timer tree:
>
> commit fc273eeef314cdaf0ac992b400d126f8184a4d1c
> Author: Len Brown
> Date: Fri Jun 17 01:22:49 2016 -0400
>
> x86/tsc_msr: Extend to include
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:59:19 -0700
"Chen, Yu C" wrote:
> Currently it is in your x86/timer tree:
>
> commit fc273eeef314cdaf0ac992b400d126f8184a4d1c
> Author: Len Brown
> Date: Fri Jun 17 01:22:49 2016 -0400
>
> x86/tsc_msr: Extend to include Intel Core Architecture
>
>
> Previously
Dear Client
Do you need a quick loan to establish, for estate license, to buy car, house,
no problem we
offer Personal loan, Business loan Student loan and General loan,
Why not take off for a little while, get away and enjoy yourself we also offer
loan for vacation.
For more information
Dear Client
Do you need a quick loan to establish, for estate license, to buy car, house,
no problem we
offer Personal loan, Business loan Student loan and General loan,
Why not take off for a little while, get away and enjoy yourself we also offer
loan for vacation.
For more information
Dear Client
Do you need a quick loan to establish, for estate license, to buy car, house,
no problem we
offer Personal loan, Business loan Student loan and General loan,
Why not take off for a little while, get away and enjoy yourself we also offer
loan for vacation.
For more information
Dear Client
Do you need a quick loan to establish, for estate license, to buy car, house,
no problem we
offer Personal loan, Business loan Student loan and General loan,
Why not take off for a little while, get away and enjoy yourself we also offer
loan for vacation.
For more information
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Look at stat.
Thanks. OK that was what I wanted. I hadn't looked further than man 2
stat - I think the stat man page needs an update.
In /usr/include/bits/stat.h:
struct stat
{
__dev_t st_dev; /* Device. */
...
#ifdef __USE_MISC
/*
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:09:52 +0800
Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an existing linux userspace interface for accessing the
> microsecond or nanosecond level (a|m|c)times of filesystems that support
> them (e.g. ext4, xfs)? and possibly also the generation counters used by
>
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:09:52 +0800
Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an existing linux userspace interface for accessing the
microsecond or nanosecond level (a|m|c)times of filesystems that support
them (e.g. ext4, xfs)? and possibly also the generation counters used by
NFS.
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Look at stat.
Thanks. OK that was what I wanted. I hadn't looked further than man 2
stat - I think the stat man page needs an update.
In /usr/include/bits/stat.h:
struct stat
{
__dev_t st_dev; /* Device. */
...
#ifdef __USE_MISC
/*
Li Yu wrote:
>
> However, I found the sys_futex() do not use rt_mutex, so what's mean of the
> user futex you said?
> Even, I have not found any usage for rt_mutex in kernel code. Or, some
> beautiful story will happen in future?
>
Just need to look a little deeper :-)
sys_futex calls
Li Yu wrote:
However, I found the sys_futex() do not use rt_mutex, so what's mean of the
user futex you said?
Even, I have not found any usage for rt_mutex in kernel code. Or, some
beautiful story will happen in future?
Just need to look a little deeper :-)
sys_futex calls do_futex
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Li Yu wrote:
>
>>> Now since mutexes can be defined by user-land applications, we don't
>>>
>> want a DOS
>>
>>> type of application that nests large amounts of mutexes to create a large
>>> PI chain, and have the code holding spin locks while looking at a
Li Yu wrote:
>> Now since mutexes can be defined by user-land applications, we don't
> want a DOS
>> type of application that nests large amounts of mutexes to create a large
>> PI chain, and have the code holding spin locks while looking at a large
>> amount of data. So to prevent this, the
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Li Yu wrote:
Hi, Steven.
Nice to meet you again.
I have read the rt-mutex-design.txt that you wrote. That is excellent
description of rt_mutex. But I have a question for rt_mutex.
As you said:
Now since mutexes can be defined by user-land applications, we don't
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Li Yu wrote:
Hi, Steven.
Nice to meet you again.
I have read the rt-mutex-design.txt that you wrote. That is excellent
description of rt_mutex. But I have a question for rt_mutex.
As you said:
Now since mutexes can be defined by user-land applications, we don't
Li Yu wrote:
Now since mutexes can be defined by user-land applications, we don't
want a DOS
type of application that nests large amounts of mutexes to create a large
PI chain, and have the code holding spin locks while looking at a large
amount of data. So to prevent this, the implementation
Steven Rostedt wrote:
Li Yu wrote:
Now since mutexes can be defined by user-land applications, we don't
want a DOS
type of application that nests large amounts of mutexes to create a large
PI chain, and have the code holding spin locks while looking at a large
amount of
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 09:00 -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
> linuxer linuxer wrote:
> > Hi, everyone:
> > I am a newbie, if my question waste your time, I
> > am sorry for that.
> >
> > In clnt.c file ,call_timeout function:
> > I suggest the code that judge whether the network
> >
linuxer linuxer wrote:
Hi, everyone:
I am a newbie, if my question waste your time, I
am sorry for that.
In clnt.c file ,call_timeout function:
I suggest the code that judge whether the network
link status is down should be added, won't they?
I tested it with one Ethernet
linuxer linuxer wrote:
Hi, everyone:
I am a newbie, if my question waste your time, I
am sorry for that.
In clnt.c file ,call_timeout function:
I suggest the code that judge whether the network
link status is down should be added, won't they?
I tested it with one Ethernet
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 09:00 -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
linuxer linuxer wrote:
Hi, everyone:
I am a newbie, if my question waste your time, I
am sorry for that.
In clnt.c file ,call_timeout function:
I suggest the code that judge whether the network
link status is
Just to follow up to myself, after futher testing, it looks like it's an
SMP-related problem. I'm not yet sure if it's an SMP-Via chipset
problem or just an SMP problem. I've heard from two people with this
same problem. I think one of them has a Via chipset and I'm not sure
about the other
Just to follow up to myself, after futher testing, it looks like it's an
SMP-related problem. I'm not yet sure if it's an SMP-Via chipset
problem or just an SMP problem. I've heard from two people with this
same problem. I think one of them has a Via chipset and I'm not sure
about the other
I think I've seen this same problem, at least with regards to USB
printing. Yesterday, I traced the problem down to a patch to usb-uhci.c
in the transition from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4. The problem persists today. A
work around for this problem is to use the alternate UHCI driver
(uhci.o).
What
I think I've seen this same problem, at least with regards to USB
printing. Yesterday, I traced the problem down to a patch to usb-uhci.c
in the transition from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4. The problem persists today. A
work around for this problem is to use the alternate UHCI driver
(uhci.o).
What
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Micah Gorrell wrote:
> I have a compaq 8 way server with 4 gigs of memory. I am running 2.4.0 and
> everything works just fine (except the gig - I'm still fighting with that)
> The only strange thing that I am seeing is that I only see 3.3 gigs of
> memory instead of the
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Micah Gorrell wrote:
I have a compaq 8 way server with 4 gigs of memory. I am running 2.4.0 and
everything works just fine (except the gig - I'm still fighting with that)
The only strange thing that I am seeing is that I only see 3.3 gigs of
memory instead of the full
40 matches
Mail list logo